|
|
#1
04-06-2007, 06:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Live hand argument! Clear up :-)
Ok ill explain this best possible, but were playin a live game and its broke into an argument as to wether the hand was played wrong or not:
UTG raises to 60 UTG+2 calls CO raises 200 more UTG folds UTG+2 pushes for 300 more CO calls UTG+2 has QQ, CO has TT. Should UTG+2 have raised the UTG raise to 60? Flat calling is bad, as UTG+2 would fold to a re-raise pre, winning the hand. Argument is he has to flat call because he wants callers so he gets value for money. Anyone? extra notes: co is a tight player, rarely plays hands. UTG+1 is a pretty tight player too, althou does bluff. co is pretty tight solid player.. 
|
|
#3
04-06-2007, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Live hand argument! Clear up :-)
Criminey sakes,
1. this is totally a NL question. 2. its not a hand arguement (like whos the winner, someone mucked early...its a theory question) 3. It looks to me like an overpush is in order, taking QQ 3 way kinda sucks, we have a great shot at beating villan heads up, and i dont like to slowplay QQ in this pot. read post rules please thanks
|
|
#8
04-06-2007, 09:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Live hand argument! Clear up :-)
"Argument is he has to flat call because he wants callers so he gets value for money."
IMO this is terrible. This is not a hand you want alot of callers, maybe you + 2 opponents at the most. Pro's will slowplay hands like this is early position in hopes of an opportunity arising where they can re-raise preflop and 'trap' people. If he was not doing it for this purpose then he is pretty bad imo, the only other case I can see is hoping to flop a set. His play was nice, but the way you talk about why he did it seems very foolish.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
