|
|
#11
08-08-2007, 11:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PM Spam: Party RB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] However, whichever mod got to it first made it a temp ban, so you would be effectively overruling their decision. Leave it alone. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] party rakeback talk found anywhere on site is perm ban. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#12
08-08-2007, 11:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PM Spam: Party RB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] However, whichever mod got to it first made it a temp ban, so you would be effectively overruling their decision. Leave it alone. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Quoting a bad idea doesn't make it a good one.
|
|
#13
08-09-2007, 07:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PM Spam: Party RB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] However, whichever mod got to it first made it a temp ban, so you would be effectively overruling their decision. Leave it alone. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Quoting a bad idea doesn't make it a good one. [/ QUOTE ] In fact, I agree entirely with iron's sentiments. It is the fundamental basis of the whole Team idea that no mod should undo another mod's work without pre-discussion. Which is why I wrote: [ QUOTE ] I would ask that strikeaa's tempban be made a permaban, too, in light of the above new information. [/ QUOTE ] However, once Mat said it should be an auto-permaban, and as the mod that had temp-banned the guy hadn't left a Note, I permabanned him, wrote a Note, and informed Mat and mods via this pertinent thread that the deed was done.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
