Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)

[primetime32]

[ QUOTE ]


28: he has the pot odds to make this call if he puts monsterhood exactly on A3

Seat 1 - MONSTERHOOD ($51680 in chips)
Seat 3 - POTRIPPER ($558072 in chips)
Seat 4 - PLETT25 ($93188 in chips)
Seat 8 - CRAZYMARCO ($277060 in chips)
MONSTERHOOD - Ante $360
POTRIPPER - Ante $360
PLETT25 - Ante $360
CRAZYMARCO - Ante $360
MONSTERHOOD - Posts small blind $1800
POTRIPPER - Posts big blind $3600
Dealt to MONSTERHOOD [As 3d]
*** POCKET CARDS ***
PLETT25 - Folds
CRAZYMARCO - Raises $8175 to $8175
MONSTERHOOD - All-In(Raise) $49520 to $51320
POTRIPPER - Calls $47720
CRAZYMARCO - Folds
*** TURN *** [Jh Qc 5d] [Kd]
*** FLOP *** [Jh Qc 5d]
*** RIVER *** [Jh Qc 5d Kd] [Ad]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
MONSTERHOOD - Shows [As 3d] (One pair, aces)
POTRIPPER - Shows [Qh 10s] (Straight, ten to ace)

[/ QUOTE ]

I am getting pretty confused here. This guy is a moron in the way he cheats and apparently doesn't know how to hide his cheating and yet he is making perfect odds calculations to make calls with Q-10. What if the A-3 held up?

if he is smart enough to calculate the proper call then he would know that there are far better situations to get it all in when you see peoples cards.

Count me as one of the guys that just isnt convinced. I am not saying this guy isnt cheating, but if i was on a jury there is no way i convict this guy on the totality of the hands presented to this point.

Obviously, Absolute will deny the allegations so that post won't sway my opinion one way or the other.