|
|
#11
11-02-2007, 12:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sorta brag, sorta cry for help
[ QUOTE ]
The avg player at 6m is pretty good now imo even at 10 games. I would not be surprised if even the best players had only a 1BB winrate over 200K+ samples. I don't table select much tho -- and that is probably more important now than ever. [/ QUOTE ] well...surprise. and no im not talking about myself. 
|
|
#13
11-02-2007, 12:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sorta brag, sorta cry for help
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The avg player at 6m is pretty good now imo even at 10 games. I would not be surprised if even the best players had only a 1BB winrate over 200K+ samples. I don't table select much tho -- and that is probably more important now than ever. [/ QUOTE ] well...surprise. and no im not talking about myself. [/ QUOTE ] at 10/20 games? Where the rake accounts for 1.5bb/100? And filtered for 6 handed? Cause I would be surprised too. It's easy when you factor in hu.
|
|
#14
11-02-2007, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sorta brag, sorta cry for help
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...page=&vc=1
solid_p doesn't play higher than 10/20 i believe. edit - rather, he does, but that first graph is pretty conclusive.
|
|
#15
11-02-2007, 01:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sorta brag, sorta cry for help
[ QUOTE ]
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...page=&vc=1 solid_p doesn't play higher than 10/20 i believe. edit - rather, he does, but that first graph is pretty conclusive. [/ QUOTE ] Dude...a huge part of that graph was from the old party days
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
