Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Puzzles and Other Games
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What are you really hoping for
Rooney gets fit ASAP 18 47.37%
Rooney remains crocked 20 52.63%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2251  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:12 PM
Neil S Neil S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 10,611
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

You guys didn't need a hobbit seer anyway. Between nicking Merry/Pippin early, seeing through Nich right away, finding Frodo when you did, and the day/night you got Traz, it'd have been a travesty if you lost.
Reply With Quote
  #2252  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:13 PM
TruFloridaGator TruFloridaGator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boomer Sooner
Posts: 10,871
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

I understood why some didn't switch off of me obviously but it was just compounded by the fact that VR wasn't around & someone was voting for neither GT1T or me. I did understand, I was just a bit flabbergasted, but then I realized how well it could work out.
Reply With Quote
  #2253  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:14 PM
TruFloridaGator TruFloridaGator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boomer Sooner
Posts: 10,871
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

[ QUOTE ]
oh ok -- not wolfchat - just out of thread communication with another player (and private), but not the same at all as what i did

[/ QUOTE ]

I talked to sighing before I did, he saw what I was saying in the chat.
Reply With Quote
  #2254  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:15 PM
sighing sighing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,330
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

[ QUOTE ]
Dark should have won that in a rout though. I <3 your games sighing, but they tend to be just a wee bit villager bias.

[/ QUOTE ]
I designed this one about 55/45 to favor the wolves.

It's not my fault that (a) the wolves sacrificed Sauron on Day 1, and (b) the wolves had the angel AND Sam out on Day 3 and decided not to kill either.
Reply With Quote
  #2255  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:16 PM
soah soah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 20,529
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

[ QUOTE ]
oh ok -- not wolfchat - just out of thread communication with another player (and private), but not the same at all as what i did

[/ QUOTE ]

you're right, they are not the same at all. you cheated and I didn't
Reply With Quote
  #2256  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:17 PM
sighing sighing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,330
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

Econo got a strong warning for that post. If he'd actually had a peek on Luckay at that point it would've been an instant modkill. Anyone doing something like that in one of my games (or hopefully anyone's games) in the future will be modkilled without futher warning.

Btw, TFG also made a post like that in another game thread (that nichp was an obvious villager) after he was dead.
Reply With Quote
  #2257  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:18 PM
sighing sighing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,330
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

One-way communication is fine. Soah can talk to a dead wolf, as long as the wolf isn't responding...
Reply With Quote
  #2258  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:20 PM
soah soah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 20,529
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Dark should have won that in a rout though. I <3 your games sighing, but they tend to be just a wee bit villager bias.

[/ QUOTE ]
I designed this one about 55/45 to favor the wolves.

It's not my fault that (a) the wolves sacrificed Sauron on Day 1, and (b) the wolves had the angel AND Sam out on Day 3 and decided not to kill either.

[/ QUOTE ]

we killed one seer before he gave out any clear peeks, converted the convertible character, killed two other power roles, knew the identities of two more power roles, got 4 villagers lynched in the first 5 days, blocked the other seer twice, and we were hanging on for dear life to stay in the game at all.
Reply With Quote
  #2259  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:20 PM
sighing sighing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,330
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

Oh, one interesting point -

The night Merry and Pippin died, before anyone's roles were exposed, Aaronk protected Herbie, VR blocked Aaron, and the wolves ate Herbie.

I don't think I've ever seen that happen in a game.
Reply With Quote
  #2260  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:21 PM
Zurvan Zurvan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oshawa
Posts: 10,229
Default Re: LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring (GAME THREAD)

afs;lkheaogiuhaoaskl jadjshgak jhalsa;di1f asdlkj asldihga gha;lkda

I'm so disgusted with this game I want to barf. I was still not completely sold on who to lynch this morning, but killing me instead of nez made it 100% obvious it was lastchance. Never in a million years does Stephen do that.

Just like the IY kill made it obvious it was soah, not me.

Blindly lynching people to sort out the day 1 wagons was terrible terrible terrible.

Traz going off like that when he was the seer was obscene.

Nich leading the village around by the nose, when a simple fake peek would have cleared econ from being frodo. Yes, fake peeks are bad, and normally I would say there's no excuse. This one situation is an exception, IMO, because the fake peek could be cleared up if nich dies that night.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.