#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL AA preflop against two tight villains
Oh, gotcha. So THIS is why people shove allin into me with TT. I was wondering about that. Thanks for clearing that up Vizer.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL AA preflop against two tight villains
[ QUOTE ]
200NL. Bodog. Effective stacks $200. Villain_1 is 16/2/1. Villain_2 is 17/3/1. Hero is 18/9/2. Hero raises to $7 with AA UTG. Villain_1 raises to $25 from MP2. Villain calls $25 from the button. Folds to hero. Hero? [/ QUOTE ] How many hands have you played with these two to get your stats? I'm also curious why you think flat calling will make you more money in the long-run. You are going to be OOP in a 3-bet pot 3-ways. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL AA preflop against two tight villains
About 1500 hands. I don't know if flat calling is more +EV; that's why I'm posting this question...I was hoping maybe we can put some numbers together.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL AA preflop against two tight villains
[ QUOTE ]
I was questioning your skill level because if you're playing NL200 you should definitely know what to do with A,A preflop. [/ QUOTE ] Bodog 200NL = ~50NL on FTP/PS |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL AA preflop against two tight villains
That's mostly untrue. I've played extensively at both Bodog and FTP. Yes, it's probably true that Bodog has more donks than FTP, but the skill level of the regulars (and plenty of others) is on par with FTP. I'd say that the skill level of the median player on Bodog is only very slightly worse than that of the players on FTP.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL AA preflop against two tight villains
$70
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL AA preflop against two tight villains
this thread is sad
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL AA preflop against two tight villains
Why is it sad?
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL AA preflop against two tight villains
[ QUOTE ]
Easy fold. [/ QUOTE ] they won't put you on AA w/ this line |
|
|