Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old 09-26-2007, 12:10 AM
m_the0ry m_the0ry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 790
Default Re: Ken Miller: scientist and believeing Catholic

Evolution certainly isn't 'anti-God', but it definitely is anti-scripture, and in that sense is mostly anti-religious.

Scripture and religion explicitly state that humanity is the prideful product of God and the rest of the animal kingdom was created for mankind's own use. There are obvious conflicts that arise between this religious view of God and evolution, because evolution is founded on common ancestry. At what point on our evolutionary path did we humans become 'special'? Was it when the first bacteria was born? The first mammal? Was it when we developed the large frontal lobe? Societies? Or only after we invented religion?

The Evolutionary Compatibilist wants to redefine our 'specialness' just like a Free Will Compatibilist wants to redefine free will. It's a pretty big concession to admit that man is the product of a mindless algorithm instead of divine intervention.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.