WCOOP threads??? - Page 3

Georgia Avenue · #21 10-19-2007, 01:13 AM

wow

jaydub · #22 10-19-2007, 01:44 AM

Post deleted by Mike Haven

shaniac · #23 10-19-2007, 01:53 AM

whose lawyers?

jaydub · #24 10-19-2007, 01:57 AM

[ QUOTE ]
whose lawyers?

[/ QUOTE ]

It is irrelevant, DUCY?

J

shaniac · #25 10-19-2007, 02:00 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
whose lawyers?

[/ QUOTE ]

It is irrelevant, DUCY?

J

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, I do, but I want to know how the process unfolded.

jaydub · #26 10-19-2007, 02:07 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
whose lawyers?

[/ QUOTE ]

It is irrelevant, DUCY?

J

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, I do, but I want to know how the process unfolded.

[/ QUOTE ]

A letter was sent, a Malmuth or a Sklansky wet himself, and the post vanished.

J

LeapFrog · #27 10-19-2007, 02:10 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
whose lawyers?

[/ QUOTE ]

It is irrelevant, DUCY?

J

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, I do, but I want to know how the process unfolded.

[/ QUOTE ]

A letter was sent, a Malmuth or a Sklansky wet himself, and the post vanished.

J

[/ QUOTE ]

So when is the letter from AP coming? Over/Under?

steve1127 · #28 10-19-2007, 02:16 AM

I still don't understand what they could have threatened 2+2 with. What would 2+2 have been scared of?

apefish · #29 10-19-2007, 03:11 AM

I can think of reasons the request would have come/been advised.

That said I think it's pretty weaksauce.

MrTimCaum · #30 10-19-2007, 03:13 AM

this is pretty pathetic of stars imo