|
View Poll Results: Who for the top 3? | |||
Betty | 2 | 6.67% | |
Carlos | 2 | 6.67% | |
Cliff | 9 | 30.00% | |
Elia | 0 | 0% | |
Frank | 1 | 3.33% | |
Ilan | 8 | 26.67% | |
Josie | 1 | 3.33% | |
Marcel | 1 | 3.33% | |
Marisa | 0 | 0% | |
Mia | 1 | 3.33% | |
Mike | 0 | 0% | |
Sam | 5 | 16.67% | |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
Agree about his attempts at trolling just making him look stupid, but if you ban him, I'm sure there will be *some* rumblings that the reasoning behind it is because of his stupid trolling.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
BAN ERICW
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
ban ericw if it means unbanning stan ivey. i will gladly accept this tradeoff
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
Dids, just do it.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] if blutarski in his hayday of stupidity wasn't permabanned (i'll admit he got a lot better since), there's no reason for ericW to be banned aside from your own personal grudge against him [/ QUOTE ] Keep in mind, I wasn't mod or really paying attention to Bluto did during his worst times. [/ QUOTE ] Dids, blut has actively contributed to several important bbv4l things, like the mspaint compendium. lots people hate him, but i think he has actually been +forum EV at many points, even when he was supposedly at his worst. EricW has absolutely never provided +EV (so to speak in poker nerd language) to the forum. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Meh, I think banning him just gives him what he wants. [/ QUOTE ] How is this not a win-win? What's he going to do, go make a stink with a gimmick in ATF about how he's being treated so unfairly and Dids gets to make his blog-type posts but EricW's are "contained" (this is just predicting how he'll word it, I don't personally give a [censored]) and this is blatant mod discrimination etc etc? And then all the people that matter on 2+2 (lol) will be like "lol nobody cares about you Eric" and we'll all get on with our merry lives, sans EricW. He contributes nothing to the forum anymore, hasn't in a long time, and exists solely to direct mean-spirited trolling at Dids (or judging by this thread, other posters as well). He's nothing more than a bitter assclown. Ban. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
I cant stand him lately but am against bannings. Change his layout to Wild please; you cant be mad when your layout is Wild.
(Large fonts obv) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
Also dids, you can count my vote as 50 votes. I give you full permission.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread
i liked him better when his posts weren't dids-obsessed
|
|
|