Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-24-2007, 06:54 PM
Split Suit Split Suit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Forever Downswinging
Posts: 2,590
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Attainable winrates from $25-$200nl 12 tabling, and what how would your vpip/prf change as you move up?

Thx

[/ QUOTE ]My wr after 70k hands at the $50 is just over 6 and I think that it could easily be around 9 if not for playing my c or d game sometimes. So I'd say 10 is attainable, maybe even up to 12 but obv you'd have to play very good and never tilt or have an off day.

At the $25 I think 10 is very doable, >12 is def. achievable.

I'm not sure about the vpip/pfr question. It's nearly identical for the 25 and 50.

[/ QUOTE ]

ptbb/100 or bb/100?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-24-2007, 06:55 PM
Chargers In 07 Chargers In 07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DERB of Micro/Small stakes
Posts: 1,383
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

ptbb ldo.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:05 PM
Split Suit Split Suit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Forever Downswinging
Posts: 2,590
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

u really think 10-12 is gonna b long run attainable? im thinkin that is wayy high. 7-8 are probably the ceiling for 12tablers.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:05 PM
Johnes Benjamin Johnes Benjamin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 3rd & Delaware
Posts: 848
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

so you are saying you run at 12bb/100 playing like 13/9???
I don't know if that will be sustained, but good job. I kind of suck I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:08 PM
Chargers In 07 Chargers In 07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DERB of Micro/Small stakes
Posts: 1,383
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

Maybe 12 is high but i dont think 10 is. I didnt think making 9 would mean 1700 more than i've made and I don't think I've spewed that much.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:20 PM
MAxx MAxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Upper East Side
Posts: 3,185
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

One thing I am having a little trouble getting used to in NL is adjusting to calculating implied odds, whereas it seemed to be very easy in limit.

It's probably a multi-pronged issue:

1) Doing the caculation quickly

2) Estimating how much I will likely get paid off if I hit. I realize this is still player and stacksize dependant, but perhaps it just comes with experience.

3) Maybe it would help to have a few basic scenarios for preflop situtions, but it is more of an issue with the postflop on draws

General guidance or any specific suggestions would be greatly appreciated
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:34 PM
ElectricWaffles ElectricWaffles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK, Leicestershire & Hertfordshire
Posts: 200
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

I've seen a few posts where people are using Aggression Factor when assesing what a 'donkbet' means (She has a high aggression factor so a donkbet doesn't mean much, for example)

That's the incorrect stat to be looking at right? Isn't BetFlop% a better stat to be looking at when assesing donkbets?

It seems obvious to me, but i've seen lots of people drawing inferences from Agg. Factor. Am I missing something there by taking the aggression factor stat too literally (ie. How often somebody raises&bets versus how often they just call)?

I think thats n00bish enough to go in this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:35 PM
ledders07 ledders07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: suburban knight
Posts: 566
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

why is the chat thread called "purple goose"?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:40 PM
Split Suit Split Suit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Forever Downswinging
Posts: 2,590
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

[ QUOTE ]
I've seen a few posts where people are using Aggression Factor when assesing what a 'donkbet' means (She has a high aggression factor so a donkbet doesn't mean much, for example)

That's the incorrect stat to be looking at right? Isn't BetFlop% a better stat to be looking at when assesing donkbets?

It seems obvious to me, but i've seen lots of people drawing inferences from Agg. Factor. Am I missing something there by taking the aggression factor stat too literally (ie. How often somebody raises&bets versus how often they just call)?

I think thats n00bish enough to go in this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

i dont use this stat to infer much about thier donk bets. generally donk bets from TAGs mean they hit a set and are tryying to pressure u into raising (very +EV play in multiway pots when u have ppl to act after u). and LAGs just do it

most ppl over-use the AF #. that number doesnt have much meaning because it doesnt mean anything until u get to a big sample size (400+hands)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:56 PM
m bozeman m bozeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dodgin\' 1-outers at Stars
Posts: 716
Default Re: Full Ring 101 Questions - N00Bs ask here

I tried the legopoker converter. After I pasted the hand there, and hit "convert hand", it disappeared and it said "no hand histories detected". What did I do wrong?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.