|
|
|
|
#1
10-20-2007, 03:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
Full Tilt Poker
Pot Limit Omaha Ring game Blinds: $2/$4 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $250 UTG+1: $466 CO: $580.30 Button: $1140 SB: $396 hero: $413.40 Pre-flop: (6 players) hero is BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3 folds, <font color="#cc0000">SB raises to $12</font>, hero calls. Flop: 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($24, 3 players) <font color="#cc0000">SB bets $24</font>, hero calls. Turn: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($72, 3 players) <font color="#cc0000">SB bets $52</font>, <font color="#cc0000">hero raises to $168</font>, SB calls. River: T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($408, 3 players) SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">hero is all-in $209.4</font> 
|
|
#2
10-20-2007, 04:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
I don't mind it, Pete. You've got the Q blocker for the straight and there's really only one hand that can call this - KK. TTxx would be retarded as it wouldn't have gone past the turn so unless he's got the 2nd nuts, he'll be finding this near impossible to call.
|
|
#3
10-20-2007, 09:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
in my experience once they call the turn here, they are just never folding
|
|
#4
10-20-2007, 04:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
in my experience once they call the turn here, they are just never folding [/ QUOTE ] This is the main reason I posted. I have generally found this too. If I had a PSB left in my stack I probably wouldn't have bothered firing the river at all. But with a half-psb, I'm getting a pretty good price on the bluff, and (maybe?) it looks stronger than a half-PSB when I have more chips behind.
|
|
#5
10-20-2007, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
You have to know this player too right? You didn't do this vs a complete unknown I take it?
|
|
#6
10-20-2007, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
You have to know this player too right? You didn't do this vs a complete unknown I take it? [/ QUOTE ] Not a ton of history, but I'd been playing with him for a couple hours and he was moderately loose-aggressive. I don't think a special read is all that necessary though.
|
|
#8
10-20-2007, 10:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
in my experience once they call the turn here, they are just never folding [/ QUOTE ] Once he calls the turn, he is probably calling the river getting 3 to 1. What is your image?
|
|
#9
10-20-2007, 11:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] in my experience once they call the turn here, they are just never folding [/ QUOTE ] Once he calls the turn, he is probably calling the river getting 3 to 1. What is your image? [/ QUOTE ] I would guess I have a very aggressive image. But that cuts both ways -- I could definitely be bluffing, but I could also be value-betting pretty thin. And of course the fact that he's getting good odds cuts both ways as well -- on the one hand you'd think he'd call, but on the other hand he might think I wouldn't try to bluff him when he's so "obviously" pot-committed. plus, of course, it means I'm getting good odds.
|
|
#10
10-21-2007, 12:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
Obviously he is more likely to call you if you have a pretty aggressive image. You may need a PSB on the river to pull this off if he had a decent but not great hand.
If you plan on firing on the river regardless of what comes out, I like TheRempel's idea of betting less on the turn in order to have a PSB on the river. The smaller than pot bet on the turn may look scarier than a PSB too.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
