#1
|
|||
|
|||
My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
Hey all,
I started playing SNGs two/three weeks ago (switching over from NL cash) and I've been quite successful. I started with the 33s, then moved up to the 55s and now I'm 8 tabling the 100s, starting another everytime I finish one. What do you guys think? Do you guys think I'm just having some beginners luck or might I be able to sustain these rates (40% ROI) or at least sustain a 30% ROI at the 100s? I will be very happy with that earning rate. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
God why does this happen to all the people who dont deserve it and never to the people who really need it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
You need to see the biggest luckbox thread.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
[ QUOTE ]
You need to see the biggest luckbox thread. [/ QUOTE ] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
does anyone know how to tie a noose knot?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
[ QUOTE ]
does anyone know how to tie a noose knot? [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, I've been trying to tie mine for months but it's never tight enough, [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]. Yugoslav |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
People are saying you are running very good.
However, you seem to be doing something right and I hope you stick around and contribute. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
This is obviously a hot streak but I think a lot of it has to do with switching over from NL cash. I have had abnormally good results after my stint playing 6max NL 200 (some ring). The early play is so bad that a person with good knowledge of the nuances of deep stack NL play can really tear these things up.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
Can you teach me how to win coinflips? My skill seems to lack in this area of SNGs
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
these are party regulars I presume ?
|
|
|