#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
no @ ur second graph
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
your second graph makes no sense to me. The other two are reasonable. I would mark either one correct if I was the prof.
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
the professor's answer can't possibly be right. limesparks picture above was the best answer. Boom's first answer also works. 2nd answer doesn't.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
[ QUOTE ]
PV = nRT P = nRT/V nRT are constant so P is inversely related to V. Linearly related. So as V gets bigger, P gets smaller and vice versa. They gave away the answer in the first sentence. Except for the linear part. WTF? [/ QUOTE ] DBZ talkin about math is so hawt- also ... i have a headache from tryin to comprehend your professors graph |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
does the axis necessarily mean zero?
for the first one i guess your explanation is fine but ur not including part so i could see why he could mark it wrong. sometimes nitty [censored] like that is important. imo open circles on the axes would be best. yeah and 2nd is ldo wrong |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
[ QUOTE ]
does the axis necessarily mean zero? for the first one i guess your explanation is fine but ur not including part so i could see why he could mark it wrong. sometimes nitty [censored] like that is important. imo open circles on the axes would be best. yeah and 2nd is ldo wrong [/ QUOTE ] Axis doesn't have to be 0, but without denoting it otherwise then yes it should be 0. Boost > both you and teacher fail at math. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
lolololol @ graph 2
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
[edit]Oh I grunched. Second graph is for crackheads, but 'A for effort' since the earlier (CORRECT) answer was marked off. Please elaborate prof's justification fro his being right, and your graph #1 being wrong.
PS Asymptotes make earlier graph more accurate than mine, but that describes actual relationship between P and V, not the Ideal Gas Law model.[/edit] grunch: Geebus, this is simple Ideal Gas Law (PV=nRT). The term nRT remains constant. So as P increases, V decreases; as P decreases, V increases. Inverse proportional relationship. P EQUALS K TIMES INVERSE V. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
[ QUOTE ]
[edit]Oh I grunched. Second graph is for crackheads, but 'A for effort' since the earlier (CORRECT) answer was marked off. Please elaborate prof's justification fro his being right, and your graph #1 being wrong. PS Asymptotes make earlier graph more accurate than mine, but that describes actual relationship between P and V, not the Ideal Gas Law model.[/edit] grunch: Geebus, this is simple Ideal Gas Law (PV=nRT). The term nRT remains constant. So as P increases, V decreases; as P decreases, V increases. Inverse proportional relationship. P EQUALS K TIMES INVERSE V. [/ QUOTE ] dude, if nRT is a constant k, then V = k/P. graph this on ur calculator its not a straight line i swear make ur graph log V vs. log P and then we got a deal |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins
limesparks is right imo
|
|
|