Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > BBV4Life
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 10-22-2007, 03:50 PM
Triptanes Triptanes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nacogdoches
Posts: 594
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

no @ ur second graph
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 10-22-2007, 05:48 PM
Max Raker Max Raker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 708
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

your second graph makes no sense to me. The other two are reasonable. I would mark either one correct if I was the prof.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-22-2007, 06:31 PM
kevin017 kevin017 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 624
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

the professor's answer can't possibly be right. limesparks picture above was the best answer. Boom's first answer also works. 2nd answer doesn't.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-22-2007, 06:59 PM
IlliniLou IlliniLou is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Livin\' the dream
Posts: 1,834
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

[ QUOTE ]
PV = nRT
P = nRT/V

nRT are constant so P is inversely related to V. Linearly related.

So as V gets bigger, P gets smaller and vice versa. They gave away the answer in the first sentence. Except for the linear part. WTF?

[/ QUOTE ]
DBZ talkin about math is so hawt- also ... i have a headache from tryin to comprehend your professors graph
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 10-22-2007, 07:13 PM
ebepse ebepse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 4,864
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

does the axis necessarily mean zero?

for the first one i guess your explanation is fine but ur not including part so i could see why he could mark it wrong. sometimes nitty [censored] like that is important.

imo open circles on the axes would be best.

yeah and 2nd is ldo wrong
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 10-22-2007, 07:26 PM
DoGGz DoGGz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Grinding?
Posts: 545
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

[ QUOTE ]
does the axis necessarily mean zero?

for the first one i guess your explanation is fine but ur not including part so i could see why he could mark it wrong. sometimes nitty [censored] like that is important.

imo open circles on the axes would be best.

yeah and 2nd is ldo wrong

[/ QUOTE ]

Axis doesn't have to be 0, but without denoting it otherwise then yes it should be 0.

Boost > both you and teacher fail at math.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 10-22-2007, 08:31 PM
klownage klownage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 532
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

lolololol @ graph 2
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 10-22-2007, 08:50 PM
pa3lsvt pa3lsvt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: donating to a game near you
Posts: 841
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

[edit]Oh I grunched. Second graph is for crackheads, but 'A for effort' since the earlier (CORRECT) answer was marked off. Please elaborate prof's justification fro his being right, and your graph #1 being wrong.
PS Asymptotes make earlier graph more accurate than mine, but that describes actual relationship between P and V, not the Ideal Gas Law model.[/edit]

grunch:

Geebus, this is simple Ideal Gas Law (PV=nRT). The term nRT remains constant. So as P increases, V decreases; as P decreases, V increases. Inverse proportional relationship. P EQUALS K TIMES INVERSE V.

Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 10-22-2007, 09:07 PM
Limesparks Limesparks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WOW IM SMART
Posts: 2,482
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

[ QUOTE ]
[edit]Oh I grunched. Second graph is for crackheads, but 'A for effort' since the earlier (CORRECT) answer was marked off. Please elaborate prof's justification fro his being right, and your graph #1 being wrong.
PS Asymptotes make earlier graph more accurate than mine, but that describes actual relationship between P and V, not the Ideal Gas Law model.[/edit]

grunch:

Geebus, this is simple Ideal Gas Law (PV=nRT). The term nRT remains constant. So as P increases, V decreases; as P decreases, V increases. Inverse proportional relationship. P EQUALS K TIMES INVERSE V.



[/ QUOTE ]

dude, if nRT is a constant k, then V = k/P. graph this on ur calculator its not a straight line i swear

make ur graph log V vs. log P and then we got a deal
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 10-22-2007, 09:14 PM
ebepse ebepse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 4,864
Default Re: beat: douchey math teacher doesnt understand math (mspaint fun ins

limesparks is right imo
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.