|
|
#11
11-25-2007, 11:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Uh, 1 is far superior. Oklahoma is a fav over Mizzou and rightly so. [/ QUOTE ] I win the parlay if either 1 OR 2 hits. So 1 by itself is >50% to hit. What % of the time will #2 be true? [/ QUOTE ] I did the 2nd one for you - around 36%. 
|
|
#12
11-26-2007, 12:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Uh, 1 is far superior. Oklahoma is a fav over Mizzou and rightly so. [/ QUOTE ] I win the parlay if either 1 OR 2 hits. So 1 by itself is >50% to hit. What % of the time will #2 be true? [/ QUOTE ] I did the 2nd one for you - around 36%. [/ QUOTE ] Awesome cool thanks!
|
|
#13
11-26-2007, 12:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Uh, 1 is far superior. Oklahoma is a fav over Mizzou and rightly so. [/ QUOTE ] I win the parlay if either 1 OR 2 hits. So 1 by itself is >50% to hit. What % of the time will #2 be true? [/ QUOTE ] I did the 2nd one for you - around 36%. [/ QUOTE ] Do you feed stray cats too? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
11-26-2007, 12:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Uh, 1 is far superior. Oklahoma is a fav over Mizzou and rightly so. [/ QUOTE ] I win the parlay if either 1 OR 2 hits. So 1 by itself is >50% to hit. What % of the time will #2 be true? [/ QUOTE ] I did the 2nd one for you - around 36%. [/ QUOTE ] Do you feed stray cats too? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] The Vols did yesterday HELLLOOOOOO
|
|
#15
11-26-2007, 01:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Uh, 1 is far superior. Oklahoma is a fav over Mizzou and rightly so. [/ QUOTE ] I win the parlay if either 1 OR 2 hits. So 1 by itself is >50% to hit. What % of the time will #2 be true? [/ QUOTE ] I did the 2nd one for you - around 36%. [/ QUOTE ] Do you feed stray cats too? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] The Vols did yesterday HELLLOOOOOO [/ QUOTE ] uncalled for [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
#16
11-26-2007, 01:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
[ QUOTE ]
Uh, 1 is far superior. Oklahoma is a fav over Mizzou and rightly so. [/ QUOTE ] rofl_copter
|
|
#17
11-27-2007, 11:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
[ QUOTE ]
Uh, 1 is far superior. Oklahoma is a fav over Mizzou and rightly so. [/ QUOTE ] wow, we actually agree on something. i gotta make an appointment with a proctologist, quick.
|
|
#18
11-27-2007, 03:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
I have not had a chance to see much of Oklahoma or Mizzou...but I would think the level of talent would be far superior at Ok...
I was loving OK-3 but wanted to hear some thoughts of people who have actually watched some games.... I also like Va Tech as I have watched both teams a few times and have never been impressed by BC...and everyone on here tells me Va Tech is better than UGA...and UGA would wipe the floor with BC.
|
|
#19
11-27-2007, 03:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
I put 2 units on Tennessee +7.5 as my only play so far. I expect to add 2-3 more games and some totals.
If you look at the UT/LSU game without any of the emotional factors (Miles ----> Michigan, LSU heartbreak, UT momentum/rallying underdogs) then I think LSU beats Tennessee by 10+. But how much do these intangible things matter? How much are they worth in handicapping? I have no idea, but I think enough for Tennessee to cover and possibly win. LSU's been a bit suspect in deep coverage, but Tennessee doesn't throw a lot of deep stuff. Sometimes we do, but when we do, it's usually a sideline fly pattern. Very rarely this year have we thrown a deep post, much less for a completion. One player that I think could make a difference is the elder Cottam brother. He was our #1 TE (Chris Brown is our #1 H-Back) before he broke his wrist. He was denied a 6th year, so he returned against Kentucky and had a huge catch and run that showed why he was our #1 TE. He's 6'8", 270 and runs a 4.6. He's a gazelle. He could be a big playmaker. Arian Foster had a rough 2006, but he shined against LSU's better defense last year. Hardesty (#2 RB) might be limited, and our #3 is freshman Lennor Creer (who is the most promising RB I've seen at UT since Travis Henry, but he's young). LSU has only played a couple of OLs as good as UT's - Florida and Arkansas, and I'm not sure where UT ranks in those 3. Ainge didn't play more than 6 snaps against LSU last year on his bum ankle. He had a disastrous game in 2005 against them. What else? Nobody in our secondary can cover Doucet. Eric Berry is more athletic, but a frosh.
|
|
#20
11-27-2007, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NCAAF Early Lines Thread (Conference championship week)
[ QUOTE ]
I have not had a chance to see much of Oklahoma or Mizzou...but I would think the level of talent would be far superior at Ok... I was loving OK-3 but wanted to hear some thoughts of people who have actually watched some games.... I also like Va Tech as I have watched both teams a few times and have never been impressed by BC...and everyone on here tells me Va Tech is better than UGA...and UGA would wipe the floor with BC. [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't put any money on OU. MU was missing Temple during the OU game. OU is going to be missing Murray and possibly their leading sack guy, Auston English. MU offense > OU offense. OU defense > MU defense.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
