|
|
#11
10-08-2006, 11:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm guessin Weaver. Suppan. Carp. Reyes. No Timo or Oddjob this time and the Cards got #5 [/ QUOTE ] I thought reyes wasnt on the roster? [/ QUOTE ] The rosters can change between series 
|
|
#12
10-09-2006, 12:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
Is it too early to be salivating over the thought of Reyes, Beltran, Delgado, Green, Chavez, Valentin, and possibly Floyd lineup up from the left side against Weaver in a rockin' Shea for Game 1? [/ QUOTE ] well, that list has five guys that can only play outfield and first base. floyd probably won't be able to go, so that will solve that problem.
|
|
#13
10-09-2006, 01:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm guessin Weaver. Suppan. Carp. Reyes. [/ QUOTE ] Is it too early to be salivating over the thought of Reyes, Beltran, Delgado, Green, Chavez, Valentin, and possibly Floyd lineup up from the left side against Weaver in a rockin' Shea for Game 1? [/ QUOTE ] Ask the Padres
|
|
#14
10-09-2006, 02:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Is it too early to be salivating over the thought of Reyes, Beltran, Delgado, Green, Chavez, Valentin, and possibly Floyd lineup up from the left side against Weaver in a rockin' Shea for Game 1? [/ QUOTE ] well, that list has five guys that can only play outfield and first base. floyd probably won't be able to go, so that will solve that problem. [/ QUOTE ] Mike Francesca said tonight that Floyd will be out. Lastings Milledge was called up. Just adds to the Mets speed but takes away their power. Man, Milledge should have been traded back in July huh? Oh well, maybe he has a hell of a NLCS.
|
|
#15
10-09-2006, 03:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
It's the mid 80s rivalry I grew up with....the Mets are still more of a rival to me than the strokeoffs
Mets have the edge, but it's not by much. I'm guessing Mets in 6 as I don't think Weaver and Suppan can both keep it up. This Cards team is much better than the second half team as Edmonds is playing great, Eckstein is solid, and Wainwright pwns an injured Isringhausen. The good news is that Pujols hits well in Shea IIRC. Well, he hits well everywhere, but even moreso in Shea.
|
|
#17
10-09-2006, 10:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
A little note on the three game series that the mets swept the cards towards the end of the season.
Mulder and Marquis both started a game. Izzy blew a save. None of them on the roster. (Well Marquis might be but i hope he doesnt find a start.) No Eck or Edmonds.
|
|
#19
10-09-2006, 01:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
if the Red Birds pitch Carp in game two, they might win two games, otherwise it's Mets in 5. [/ QUOTE ] Throw some money on that.
|
|
#20
10-09-2006, 01:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] if the Red Birds pitch Carp in game two, they might win two games, otherwise it's Mets in 5. [/ QUOTE ] Throw some money on that. [/ QUOTE ] Unlikely, as that would require him to actually believe the crap that he's spewing.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
