Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #331  
Old 09-07-2007, 04:49 PM
Binbs Binbs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 204
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]


lolol.

On the topic of shortstackers. I just accept them and have never really lost much sleep over them.

But whatever decisions we make in life wether it comes to poker or whatever else, reflects what type of people we really are.

Im a very competetive person and have confidence in my abilities, therefore I would take the route of getting the most profits and making the most money.

Shortstacking requires much less skill than fullstack poker and the people who choose to do this realize they dont have the intellect/skill to be a winner at it. Plain and simple.
Reply With Quote
  #332  
Old 09-07-2007, 04:58 PM
mlagoo mlagoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: confused
Posts: 12,644
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

[ QUOTE ]
Shortstacking requires much less skill than fullstack poker and the people who choose to do this realize they dont have the intellect/skill to be a winner at it. Plain and simple.

[/ QUOTE ]

i definitely agree with this.

doesnt necessarily make shortstackers bad people, but it definitely is a concession on their part that they either cant beat the game fullstacked or are too lazy to learn, neither of which are particularly admirable. but you still gotta pay the bills i guess.
Reply With Quote
  #333  
Old 09-08-2007, 03:02 AM
_Apollo_ _Apollo_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 437
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

I'm more a lurker kinda guy but I just wanted to say that MT2R is pathetic for not backing up his big talk about jfish's datamined winrate.

I don't like shortstackers and I look down upon them, but as long as there are not 3 at my table I won't loose sleep over it.

edit: damn, didn't mean to bump this one but had it bookmarked and deleting is too late now.
Reply With Quote
  #334  
Old 09-08-2007, 06:31 PM
PrimogenitoX PrimogenitoX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 732
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

2004 World Champion and poker millionaire Gregory Raymer was spotted at two of my $5/$10NL No Limit Texas Hold'em tables today "shortstacking" with stacks of under 20BBs

PrimogenitoX: oh great...now fossilman is shortstacking too...WTF
FossilMan: just trying it out
FossilMan: I will reload, but not until down to 80 or so
FossilMan: and then will reload for less
PrimogenitoX: Raymer are you trying some kind of shortstacking experiment
PrimogenitoX: or just trying it out one time
FossilMan: trying it out a little, done it 3 sessions now

I will withhold personal commentary at this time as to this development of significant implications.
Reply With Quote
  #335  
Old 09-08-2007, 08:49 PM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

FossilMan,

Clearly happy with the <20 buck per table hourly.
Reply With Quote
  #336  
Old 09-08-2007, 08:50 PM
FatalError FatalError is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: just a skinny azzzed short stacking gossip hurling trouble maker
Posts: 2,705
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

[ QUOTE ]
2004 World Champion and poker millionaire Gregory Raymer was spotted at two of my $5/$10NL No Limit Texas Hold'em tables today "shortstacking" with stacks of under 20BBs

PrimogenitoX: oh great...now fossilman is shortstacking too...WTF
FossilMan: just trying it out
FossilMan: I will reload, but not until down to 80 or so
FossilMan: and then will reload for less
PrimogenitoX: Raymer are you trying some kind of shortstacking experiment
PrimogenitoX: or just trying it out one time
FossilMan: trying it out a little, done it 3 sessions now

I will withhold personal commentary at this time as to this development of significant implications.

[/ QUOTE ]

well he probably got about 1000 emails from winning HS players asking him to get shorting ended and got curious
Reply With Quote
  #337  
Old 09-08-2007, 09:04 PM
jfish jfish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: what else is on my mind grapes?
Posts: 8,150
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

just wow at this will do.
Reply With Quote
  #338  
Old 09-08-2007, 10:12 PM
Kiddmother Kiddmother is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Shortstacker Mom
Posts: 258
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

JUST WOW AT THIS WILL DO.
Reply With Quote
  #339  
Old 09-08-2007, 10:17 PM
thac thac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Go Buckeyes imo
Posts: 9,941
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

[ QUOTE ]
I like eating dick

[/ QUOTE ]


hm?
Reply With Quote
  #340  
Old 09-13-2007, 04:07 PM
Janis N. Janis N. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 527
Default Re: CHOO CHOO

a) MDMA makes very good points. I understand the shortstackers disagreeing with him due to being hypocrites though.

b) I've played on a site which doesn't have shortstackers (due to a small number of games and a long ratholing window) and it's a lot lot lot more fun than Party is. The default BI is 50BB and the fish mostly buy in for that or 100BB so MT2R's argument about preserving fish is a false one.

c) I tried shortstacking once and it was very lame and boring.

P.S. die shortstackers die
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.