Two 1K/2K Hands

[The Funky Llama]

how the heck is hand 2 "standard"?

[DcifrThs]

[ QUOTE ]
how the heck is hand 2 "standard"?

[/ QUOTE ]

i dont think standard applies there but uninteresting certainly does.

3betting K7o in the sb is imo a bit too loose. depending on the flowo f the game and previous history vs. eric, firing all 3 may be fine.

nothing nuts though.

not all experts play all hands perfectly, and alot of the hands you see in isolation may be correct or even expert in the flow of the game.

Barron

[geormiet]

[ QUOTE ]
these hands are distinctly uninteresting.

[/ QUOTE ]


To me, hand 2 looks like flat out tilt, and hand 1 looks like a flat out poor play. I think it would be interesting to discuss why I am wrong.

[mike l.]

that may be true, i mean maybe he's not very good i dont know, but it's still uninteresting. taking these hands in a vacuum from a 4 handed game is silly.

[Surf]

[ QUOTE ]
how the heck is hand 2 "standard"?

[/ QUOTE ]

[kapw7]

Hand 1: It's essential to c-r the river sometimes with a good hand so the next time he has A-hi it will be a bit harder for erik to value bet him with 53o.

Hand 2: I'm surpised that Erik didn't raise somewhere maybe the turn. I guess neverwin's PF donk 3-bet worked.

[geormiet]

erik123s play in hand2 is standard

[kapw7]

[ QUOTE ]
erik123s play in hand2 is standard

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you have any sort of backing argument to this naked statement?

[TxRedMan]

this reply really sucks and is given way too much, and it basically has no substance behind it because it's virtually impossible to prove or disprove due to the infinite possibilities and arguements, etc.,.

[Leader]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
erik123s play in hand2 is standard

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you have any sort of backing argument to this naked statement?

[/ QUOTE ]

He's WA/WB isn't he? How would you play it?