Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-15-2007, 02:59 PM
holdemft holdemft is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bucks Co, PA
Posts: 295
Default Re: Should I have been mad? I was!!!!!

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/po...mp;Board=beats
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-15-2007, 03:36 PM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: Should I have been mad? I was!!!!!

I don't mind postflop, and I like checkraising the flop rather than leading out.

The preflop limp/call with AK is not good. Maybe playable with AA/KK, but AK is too vulnerable. Open raising is standard. Limping isn't terrible, but you need to limpreraise. You don't mind if villain folds to the limpreraise.

You obviously confused villain as played and got your money in a huge favorite. Bad luck with the river. The limp/call is not all the bad, but it tends to lead to situations like this where you win or lose a big pot.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-15-2007, 03:40 PM
FineVol FineVol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 140
Default Re: Should I have been mad? I was!!!!!

Thanks I am starting to see how he might have thought about me. One thing is, I was chip leader and had always shown down great hands and had not lost a hand yet. I thought he would back off. Great post
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-15-2007, 03:42 PM
Xanthro Xanthro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 374
Default Re: Should I have been mad? I was!!!!!

Just be glad villian raise on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-15-2007, 03:44 PM
BigAlK BigAlK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 874
Default Re: Should I have been mad? I was!!!!!

[ QUOTE ]
Limping isn't terrible, but you need to limpreraise. You don't mind if villain folds to the limpreraise.


[/ QUOTE ] I'd missed that villian raise pre-flop. Agree with Betgo that that was your chance to get your money in or,with a reasonable villian, take the now much nicer pot down.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-15-2007, 04:20 PM
SuperNooB SuperNooB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 811
Default Re: Should I have been mad? I was!!!!!

Yah Hammer the Ace King man - Give him no chance of taking the Risk of Calling So he can Hit that 4 -Prob all in or 1/2 your Stack -Pre Flop - and if he Calls thats Poker -
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-15-2007, 04:31 PM
FineVol FineVol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 140
Default Re: Should I have been mad? I was!!!!!

I was going for deceptive and decived my chip stack.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-15-2007, 04:32 PM
Potowame Potowame is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,117
Default Re: Should I have been mad? I was!!!!!

[ QUOTE ]
I don't mind postflop, and I like checkraising the flop rather than leading out.

The preflop limp/call with AK is not good. Maybe playable with AA/KK, but AK is too vulnerable. Open raising is standard. Limping isn't terrible, but you need to limpreraise. You don't mind if villain folds to the limpreraise.

You obviously confused villain as played and got your money in a huge favorite. Bad luck with the river. The limp/call is not all the bad, but it tends to lead to situations like this where you win or lose a big pot.

[/ QUOTE ]


Spot on...

LOL at villian for checking river........ [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-15-2007, 05:05 PM
JFJB JFJB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Default Re: Should I have been mad? I was!!!!!

As I read you and got to the results, I was fully expecting vilain to show AQ here. Vilain got quite lucky on the river and it sucks (bad).

The trade off in how you played the hand versus the standard raise pre-flop, bet big on the flop and shove the turn is variance. You have to be fully aware of it and what it means.

In a tournament there a key points where you want variance and other times where you do not want to much variance and you have to play accordingly and accept that you will get the good and bad sides of variance. It is all situationnal.

Key informations missing in your post is the stack of vilain and where the tournament is at. By the size of the stacks it looks like just before or after the bubble, a criticical time. If vilain as something like 9 or 10 k then I think that betgo approach is clearly a very good one to consider. You are table chip leader, why would you want to take a high variance approach agaisnt a stack that can cripple you? If you put in a nice size re-raise (not a min raise here!!) vilain will fold most of the time and you will rake in a nice size pot, be a bigger table chip leader and be able to steal, resteal and simply pick up the chips from desperate all ins from short stacks. It does not look like you need to take the high variance approach here because you are already doing good. There are other situations where limping with AK and playing soft is a great approach but not here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.