Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:09 AM
Bulldog Bulldog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: That\'s what she said.
Posts: 3,336
Default 2008 Presidential Election

It seems to me that the upcoming Presidential election is much more wide open than in the past. How many names would you need to list to be sure to include the next Prez? 8? More?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:14 AM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: 2008 Presidential Election

[ QUOTE ]
It seems to me that the upcoming Presidential election is much more wide open than in the past. How many names would you need to list to be sure to include the next Prez? 8? More?

[/ QUOTE ]

2. Hillary and Fred Thompson.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:01 PM
iron81 iron81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Resident Donk
Posts: 6,806
Default Re: 2008 Presidential Election

To be sure you'd need a lot more than eight, but for 90% confidence, 8 is about right: Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Gore, Giuliani, Thompson, Romney, McCain
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:03 PM
irunnotgood irunnotgood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dr. Paul \'08 holla
Posts: 209
Default Re: 2008 Presidential Election

[ QUOTE ]
To be sure you'd need a lot more than eight, but for 90% confidence, 8 is about right: Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Gore, Giuliani, Thompson, Romney, McCain

[/ QUOTE ]

Paul has a better chance than Edwards and McCain.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:28 PM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 4,751
Default Re: 2008 Presidential Election

[ QUOTE ]
Paul has a better chance than Edwards and McCain.

[/ QUOTE ]

O RLY? Go make some money then:

http://www.bodog.com/sports-betting/political-props.jsp

Odds On: Who will win the 2008 Presidential Election?

John Edwards: 14/1
John McCain: 16/1
Ron Paul: 65/1

But yeah, you know better than professional handicappers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:29 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: 2008 Presidential Election

[ QUOTE ]
To be sure you'd need a lot more than eight, but for 90% confidence, 8 is about right: Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Gore, Giuliani, Thompson, Romney, McCain

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that 8 puts you well over 95% confidence. I'd offer 20-1 on the field agianst those guys. The only thing keeping me from betting is tying up that much money for that long.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:30 PM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 4,751
Default Re: 2008 Presidential Election

[ QUOTE ]
To be sure you'd need a lot more than eight, but for 90% confidence, 8 is about right: Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Gore, Giuliani, Thompson, Romney, McCain

[/ QUOTE ]

9: Michael Bloomberg

That's about it, though. I don't think you need to go beyond that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:30 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: 2008 Presidential Election

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Paul has a better chance than Edwards and McCain.

[/ QUOTE ]

O RLY? Go make some money then:

http://www.bodog.com/sports-betting/political-props.jsp

Odds On: Who will win the 2008 Presidential Election?

John Edwards: 14/1
John McCain: 16/1
Ron Paul: 65/1

But yeah, you know better than professional handicappers.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think all 3 are huge longshots. However, McCain and Edwards could win the general election if nominated against the right people and Paul cannot.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:37 PM
GoodCallYouWin GoodCallYouWin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default Re: 2008 Presidential Election

"However, McCain and Edwards could win the general election if nominated against the right people and Paul cannot. "

Ron Paul would destroy Clinton, Biden or Edwards simply because Republicans love his small government / low tax styles and the anti-war left would probably support him as well. Wall Street has a lot of money but simply not a lot of votes.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:38 PM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 4,751
Default Re: 2008 Presidential Election

[ QUOTE ]
I think all 3 are huge longshots.

[/ QUOTE ]

McCain and Edwards are clearly second tier behind what I would consider the first tier candidates (Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, Romney, Thompson) but they make plausible bets for the right price and have some significant non-zero chance of winning. I'd take McCain or Edwards if they were at 25/1 to right now, and I obviously wouldn't touch Paul at 65/1.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.