PLO Winrate

[LunatiC89]

What a winrate per 100 Hands should i have to move up in the Limit? Same as in Hold'Em?

[CrushinFelt]

62.29765 according to most experts.

Though there are some that contend 51.4758 is sufficient.

The jury is still out.

[sondring]

It's not so much about winrate as it is about # of hands played and bankroll.

What level are you playing now? How many hands? Winrate? Bankroll?

[jipster]

personally i think $100 games are generally beatable for 10 - 15 bb/100; $200 5-10BB/100.... i dont have much experience of higher; and im a losing player at plo50 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

as a note, i dont achieve anyway near what i have stated... and i consider myself to be a good player

nb i'm beating the $500 game for 13 bb/100 but im buying in for 20 big blinds hitting and running

[BadBenOni]

I am really inpressed by anyone that can make money at lower limits,

as far as I can see its all random megavolitility and the rake eats any edge a good player has.

If you are a good player playing well you wont make money at the low limits, your reads will be wrong and you will get bluffed out by donks who think bottom 2 is good.

[iggymcfly]

[ QUOTE ]
I am really inpressed by anyone that can make money at lower limits,

as far as I can see its all random megavolitility and the rake eats any edge a good player has.

If you are a mediocre player playing like a nit you wont make money at the low limits, your reads will be wrong and you won't adjust properly to easy-to-read donks who think bottom 2 is good.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP.

[plzbenice]

what? i beat PLO100 easily, a bunch of drooling gambooling donkas.

so easy.

[RoundTower]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am really inpressed by anyone that can make money at lower limits,

as far as I can see its all random megavolitility and the rake eats any edge a good player has.

If you are a mediocre player playing like a nit you wont make money at the low limits, your reads will be wrong and you won't adjust properly to easy-to-read donks who think bottom 2 is good.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP.

[/ QUOTE ]
no I think you will still clean up. If you are a bad player who thinks he's good, on the other hand, you will lose money.

[DanielDayLewis]

I'm actually pretty curious about acheivable 6max PLO winrates also.

Are they generaly greater than hold'em winrates? Like can most good $5/10 players beat $5/10 for > 5PTBB/100?

any sites to multiable midstakes? Party usually has roughly 1 $2/4 game going and 0 $3/6 when I'm on there.

[BadBenOni]

I dont think there is a general winrate,
it depends on how the styles clash.

A loose aggro table is obviously better for high winrates,
at the risk of much higher volatility.