The End of the Competent Shortstacker (Hopefully!): Part 1

[soah]

I started to write a reply, but I think I'll just take my turn to "lol"

[jfish]

lol.

[Fishstick]

I guess I was a little harsh on the shorties. Probably just leftover tilt from last nights bad run. In fact I don’t actually hate them, although they do annoy me. This isnt because they take my money (as I know how to play against them optimally), but because they take the place of bad players with full stacks and bad players with shortstacks. Id say I consider them just like any other mediocre regular that wins small amounts of money but that doesn’t drop barrels of cash in my lap.

I dont see how this thread is funny... Either way ill prob post the rest in a few days.

[CopTHIS]

[ QUOTE ]
I guess I was a little harsh on the shorties. Probably just leftover tilt from last nights bad run. In fact I don’t actually hate them, although they do annoy me. This isnt because they take my money (as I know how to play against them optimally), but because they take the place of bad players with full stacks and bad players with shortstacks. Id say I consider them just like any other mediocre regular that wins small amounts of money but that doesn’t drop barrels of cash in my lap.

I dont see how this thread is funny... Either way ill prob post the rest in a few days.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can never be too harsh on short-stackers, assuming that they are ratholers which most are. I don't mind them sometimess because so many are fish, but despite that I vote for drowning all ratholers or even suspected raholers with no trial or right of appeal.

[bet2win]

meh shortstackers just mean you have to play tighter

short stacking isnt really that profitable unless you have a bunch of lagtags who continue to play 24/20