Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:09 PM
monkeymaps monkeymaps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: davol patrick, sucks
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.

whats the deal with just posting news reports all the time pokerpaired? whats your point of view on all these news articles you post?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:01 PM
kailua kailua is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.

[ QUOTE ]
whats the deal with just posting news reports all the time pokerpaired? whats your point of view on all these news articles you post?

[/ QUOTE ]

he’s graduated from a sandwich board proclaiming world doom
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:24 PM
iversonian iversonian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 367
Default Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.

[ QUOTE ]
That's the underlying problem with these disneyland corporations, they want ALL their customers money. They're not satisfied with a tidy profit, they want ridiculously enourmous profits.

[/ QUOTE ]

I suppose you prefer the days when Vegas was barely a rest stop on the way to LA? Do you think Steve Wynn & Co. invested $630 million in the Mirage so he could keep dropping $3/hand in rake? Personally, I prefer the grandeur that is today's Vegas, and so do (#_of_2007_Vegas_tourists - #_of_1988_Vegas_tourists) other people. What do you think built these ridiculously luxurious mega-resorts if not ridiculously enormous profits / the anticipation of ridiculously enormous profits?

[ QUOTE ]
It's not enough they have always made a killing at blackjack. Now they only pay 6/5 on half the games in town. Dealers hit soft 17. Any and all minute edges towards what was still "advantage: house" are being taken away. Soon blackjack will just be a booth where you write a check to parball corporation, LLC. They probably won't even provide a dank alley for you to die in without charging you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then don't play. Or go to dingy old downtown where they still spread a decent game. I stopped doing that myself when I started making some decent money and decided I'd rather treat myself to a good time when I went to Vegas, rather than couting cards at the Four Queens even though the odds are better there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:59 PM
Al_Capone_Junior Al_Capone_Junior is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: utility muffin research kitchen
Posts: 5,766
Default Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.

On the rare occasion I do play blackjack in this town, it is always downtown at the plaza or four queens. I was born during the day, but not yesterday.

And I don't begrudge businesses making a profit, not at all. I do begrudge businesses who screw both their customers and employees alike, motivated only by profits. These companies have forgotten that you can shear a sheep many times, but skin them only once.

There are businesses that both provide a product or service at a fair price, and make a very nice profit at the same time. Sometimes they even treat their employees very well. I do preferentially patronize these places whenever I can. The lucky lady in san diego is just such a place, which is why I played about 95% of my san diego poker there. Stan, kudos to you for running a great room and taking care of your customers.

Those days may be numbered, but that doesn't make it right. I'm sure walmart and harrahs would prefer that stan die in a gutter, but they're probably trying to figure out how to get a buck out of his dead carcus.

Corporate america is scum, plain and simple. The mega resorts could do much better in the long run by taking care of people now, even if that means slightly less profits today. They won't go broke, nor will their stockholders fail to collect their dividends. But for the most part, it seems they were born at night, last night.

Al
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:43 PM
JJT JJT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Banks of the Wabash River
Posts: 134
Default Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.

I don't understand about these new-fangled poker things. Are they like the poker machines in bar tops? Or, do several people play at them at one time? Does it mean that there are no longer cards and chips to handle? I'm not a great player, but I don't think I'd continue playing in such a soulless environment.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2007, 11:21 PM
Seb86 Seb86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 215
Default Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand about these new-fangled poker things. Are they like the poker machines in bar tops? Or, do several people play at them at one time? Does it mean that there are no longer cards and chips to handle? I'm not a great player, but I don't think I'd continue playing in such a soulless environment.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, its basically a table with a central scree displaying the flop and players stack and each player has a screen with hole cards and options (check bet fold ...).

You need to put your hand on the screen to reveal the card, otherwise they are face down.

I played it once and really didnt enjoy. It was a 50+15$SNG and the stucture was crappy.

But I think it could work for :

-SNG (but with the structure and fee of online rooms)
-HU

These 2 things needs to be develloped in BM casinos and for low stakes it could be pretty good.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:47 PM
EWillers EWillers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 227
Default Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.

[ QUOTE ]
Corporate america is scum, plain and simple. The mega resorts could do much better in the long run by taking care of people now, even if that means slightly less profits today.

[/ QUOTE ]

If this were the case, then why hasn't the dominant model (as you describe it) been challenged?

If capitalism (when allowed to function) has proven anything it's that when there's a more efficient/better way of doing something, it will be discovered and implemented.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-28-2007, 11:56 PM
iversonian iversonian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 367
Default Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.

[ QUOTE ]
And I don't begrudge businesses making a profit, not at all. I do begrudge businesses who screw both their customers and employees alike, motivated only by profits. These companies have forgotten that you can shear a sheep many times, but skin them only once.

Corporate america is scum, plain and simple. The mega resorts could do much better in the long run by taking care of people now, even if that means slightly less profits today.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, that would be very convenient for you, if it were true; they'd make more money by doing what you want them to do. But where are your arguments in support of that bold contention? If you ask me, I think the best strategy is to take all their money as fast as you can (cost of *ahem* goods sold is lower that way) and then tell them you'll give them a free room & other bonuses next time they drop by -- exactly what they're trying to do now, incidentally. But what do I know. Maybe you're dead on about maximizing long term profits and this guy could learn a thing or two about the casino business by reading this thread.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.