#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
any cards we fear on the turn?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
[ QUOTE ]
The pot is going to be $8 minus rake and the effective stacks of 6 so there is really only one bet the OP can do with our stack. [/ QUOTE ] I guess I don't understand the difference between getting AI on the flop in a WA/WB situation and getting all in on the turn in a WA/WB situation. Have we agreed that we're getting AI at some point in the hand when villain bets $6 into an $8 pot? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The pot is going to be $8 minus rake and the effective stacks of 6 so there is really only one bet the OP can do with our stack. [/ QUOTE ] I guess I don't understand the difference between getting AI on the flop in a WA/WB situation and getting all in on the turn in a WA/WB situation. Have we agreed that we're getting AI at some point in the hand when villain bets $6 into an $8 pot? [/ QUOTE ] I think we fold out possible holdings that will fold to a flop shove 22-99 excluding the floped set |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
[ QUOTE ]
any cards we fear on the turn? [/ QUOTE ] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
[ QUOTE ]
GSykes is right on the money with his line and explaination [/ QUOTE ] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The pot is going to be $8 minus rake and the effective stacks of 6 so there is really only one bet the OP can do with our stack. [/ QUOTE ] I guess I don't understand the difference between getting AI on the flop in a WA/WB situation and getting all in on the turn in a WA/WB situation. Have we agreed that we're getting AI at some point in the hand when villain bets $6 into an $8 pot? [/ QUOTE ] I think we fold out possible holdings that will fold to a flop shove 22-99 excluding the floped set [/ QUOTE ] Okay this makes sense now. Thanks. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The pot is going to be $8 minus rake and the effective stacks of 6 so there is really only one bet the OP can do with our stack. [/ QUOTE ] I guess I don't understand the difference between getting AI on the flop in a WA/WB situation and getting all in on the turn in a WA/WB situation. Have we agreed that we're getting AI at some point in the hand when villain bets $6 into an $8 pot? [/ QUOTE ] I think we fold out possible holdings that will fold to a flop shove 22-99 excluding the floped set [/ QUOTE ] Okay this makes sense now. Thanks. [/ QUOTE ] No problem that is what I am here for [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. Also I am not ignoring your PM I am just waiting till tonight to respond to it. (when im done playing) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
it's not strictly true that he flods everything we beat to a shove (he may call with QQ-99) and he may well have a ten.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
[ QUOTE ]
it's not strictly true that he flods everything we beat to a shove (he may call with QQ-99) and he may well have a ten. [/ QUOTE ] You are missing the point, sure he can have QQ-99 but his range is more so balanced to 22-99. If has a ten its a cooler. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10NL im pretty sure he\'s bluffing now what?
I just don't like that expression fold everything we beat, and call with everything that beats us. There is a grey area and imo that is where the true skill of poker is.
|
|
|