#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
[ QUOTE ]
I find it extremely hard to believe you actually play poker if someone beating 179 opponents without looking at her cards doesn't even vaguely impress you. [/ QUOTE ] Someone needs to learn the difference between 'surprise' and 'impress' |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] how is this sick?!? [censored] 95% of low limit donkaments are just waiting to push any 2 cards to steal blinds [/ QUOTE ] I find it extremely hard to believe you actually play poker if someone beating 179 opponents without looking at her cards doesn't even vaguely impress you. [/ QUOTE ] like I said it doesn't really matter if it was a deepstacked, higher limit tourney then I'd be a little impressed but I'm sure that I could win a $4 180 without looking at my cards I don't think you even understand how little the cards matter when you're playing idiots that fold way too much in their BB [/ QUOTE ] Hmmm. GTFO please? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] how is this sick?!? [censored] 95% of low limit donkaments are just waiting to push any 2 cards to steal blinds [/ QUOTE ] I find it extremely hard to believe you actually play poker if someone beating 179 opponents without looking at her cards doesn't even vaguely impress you. [/ QUOTE ] anyone who actually plays and understands poker should be LESS impressed by this |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
[ QUOTE ]
but I'm sure that I could win a $4 180 without looking at my cards [/ QUOTE ] prop bet? over how many trials? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] but I'm sure that I could win a $4 180 without looking at my cards [/ QUOTE ] prop bet? over how many trials? [/ QUOTE ] we both know the variance alone doesn't make this viable I bet a reasonably good player, over time, could have a 10% ROI in these without looking at their cards |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] but I'm sure that I could win a $4 180 without looking at my cards [/ QUOTE ] prop bet? over how many trials? [/ QUOTE ] I second that notion. As much as I don't care about donkaments or donkament players, this is not easy at all to do. She had to win a bunch of 30/70s to even have a chance, let alone being able to bully all these donks out of every pot. She also ran well in that a lot of her bluffs worked out perfectly, which is a result of both skill and luck. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
didnt register for the site but WOW.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
havent seen it, but sounds very impressive
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
registered and saw the whole thing and it is sick
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Annette plays $4.40 180 blind... and wins.
[ QUOTE ]
how is this sick?!? [censored] 95% of low limit donkaments are just waiting to push any 2 cards to steal blinds [/ QUOTE ] grando, plz play a 4/180 blind and win it. if you do so, within the next week, post ur hh and i'll double ur winnings. |
|
|