|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
[ QUOTE ]
Not surprising to see a bad article. [ QUOTE ] "That people like to touch cards and interact with a dealer seems like a common sense assertion," said [PokerTek CEO] Halligan, who speaks rapidly, with the assertiveness of a young entrepreneur. "But it's false." [/ QUOTE ] Really? The manufacturer claims people have no problem. I guess they don't. He must be right. No self interest there. The statement is just left out there, as if it were undeniable. No attempt to even contact someone from Cardplayer, Bluff, 2+2, etc. [/ QUOTE ] I agree the statement was made as if it were pure fact, which of course it's not. Bullpucky is closer to fact than this ridiculousness. However, I wouldn't bother going to bluff or cardplayer if facts are what you seek. I tend to promote these publications as useful when your birdcage needs new liner. I'm starting to rethink that however, as it seems quite cruel to the birds. Al |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
[ QUOTE ]
I tend to promote these publications as useful when your birdcage needs new liner. [/ QUOTE ] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
I saw two of these tables at Commerce, but nobody was playing on them while there were many other tables going. I would think at Commerce with the grinders, these would be a hit due to the increased speed. I think that they are too intimidating to the casual player.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
Speaking at last week's Global Gaming Expo, the industry's premier trade show, Bellagio poker room director Doug Dalton called the games "the next future of poker."
Good to know card room managers have mastered the subtleties of logic in grammar. Why is this debate only happening at poker? Wouldn't electronic craps and bj games also be faster and less error prone etc. resulting in more hands per hour hour and more money for the house? |
|
|