Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-12-2007, 10:51 PM
Dave D Dave D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Suffolk Law School or Brookline
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

My bad about point out the whole "to" vs "too" thing. Not productive.

Also stack-a-donk is still very viable. I used it several times tonight in sub $30 buy ins.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-13-2007, 03:30 PM
pped5700 pped5700 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

[ QUOTE ]

Question related to the first example of maximizing value - is there a simple math calculation you use to immediately allow you to determine the best possible bet size on early streets that ultimately sets you up to make a pot sized bet on a future street?



[/ QUOTE ]

its called the geometric growth of the pot. C&A in MoP go through this quite extensively.

Pot=1
Player A bets some fraction of 1 into Pot=1, which is s1
If Player B calls, then the pot grows from 1 to (1+2s1)
r1=(1+2s1)/1
r1 is the ratio the pot will grow if the bet is called.
r2=(1+2s1+2s2)/(1+2s1)
r3=(1+2s1+2s2+2s3)/(1+2s1+2s2)

r1r2r3 is a constant where r1=r2=r3
That constant is the geometric growth of the pot. the optimal bet size on the flop gets your stack in on the river.
Depending on the texture of the flop, mandates if you want to grow the pot in 2 or 3 streets. A two-street growth of the pot is best for extremely dynamic flops, because of the clairvoyance effect that takes place on the river when your opponent is playing a draw. he in efeect plays with better information, because he knows when his draw comes in; and only pays when it does.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-13-2007, 04:29 PM
Donkey5layer Donkey5layer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Restealing against AA
Posts: 289
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

Great article bond... thanks..

what about those who say make your bet sizes the same or close to all the time that way your opponent will never know what you have...

do you think this is really only relevant against the regualars at the higher buyins and most of the marginal players in these tournaments wont catch on anyways?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-13-2007, 08:09 PM
Donkey5layer Donkey5layer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Restealing against AA
Posts: 289
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

better yet... accumulating not surviving
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-13-2007, 09:14 PM
pped5700 pped5700 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

[ QUOTE ]
CashFlop Two: 6c 7c 9h (pot 300)
Now this is a kind of board I’m looking to accomplish something a little different. I think you need to bet more to charge draws more, and if villain raises you want to make it so his raise is a more committing size. I’d bet 250 here and if villain raises, shove, since so many draws are in his range.



[/ QUOTE ]

Nice post Bond.
Not quite following your logic on letting the strong draw get his stack in on this type of flop though. We do much better getting his flop-raising range to the turn.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.