Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-24-2007, 03:52 AM
SodaSurfer SodaSurfer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 20
Default 6 Player vs. 9 Player Tables

Does anyone have any thoughts (or links to references) on the differences between playing at a 6-player vs. 9-player table? How about between a 9-player vs. 10-player table?

I'm interested in more than starting hand requirements. For example, how much more/less should I worry about another player having AK, when I have AQ? Or, are there subtle differences in how players tend to play at 6-player tables vs. 9/10 player?

Thanks for any advice!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-24-2007, 04:33 AM
Blue Lagoon Blue Lagoon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 432
Default Re: 6 Player vs. 9 Player Tables

There is a good chapter about shorthanded play in "Weighing the Odds in Hold'em Poker" from King Yao. He explains the differences between full ring and SH Limit Hold'em games: wilder fluctuations, agressivity, more heads-up play on the flop, playing the players.
He compares the table with 8-10 players, 7, 6, 5, 4 and 3 players.
And the next chapter is about "Common Mistakes in Shortanded Play", a good way to improve your SH play.

Once again, this book is about Fixed Limit Hold'em.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-24-2007, 08:21 PM
formula72 formula72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 144
Default Re: 6 Player vs. 9 Player Tables

Skilled players can have more success at 6-max because weaker players are exploited more often since they are forced to play more hands. Yes more hands can be played and raised with but it is important to use position rather than anything else. Certain strong hands very well in early but terrible in late position.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2007, 02:54 AM
Blue Lagoon Blue Lagoon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 432
Default Re: 6 Player vs. 9 Player Tables

[ QUOTE ]
Certain strong hands very well in early but terrible in late position.

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you mean?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-25-2007, 06:36 AM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: 6 Player vs. 9 Player Tables

As Blue_Lagoon pointed out, it matters whether you're asking about limit or no-limit.

One thing to consider is that if the first three players fold in a 9-handed game, it's almost like playing at a 6-handed table. It's not exactly the same, since folding makes it less likely that the first three players had a lot of A's and K's; meaning it's slightly more likely the remaining players do; but this effect is small, especially in a tight game where people need two high cards to call or raise in early position.

The fewer players in the hand, the more Q's and J's become high cards; and the less chance of straights, flushes and low-card combinations winning the pot. Kickers become less important as well.

In practice, in regular short-handed games, I find players often over-react, and play J7 as if it were A9. On the other hand, if a normal 9 or 10 player game happens to fall to 6 players, you tend to see players undervaluing Q's and J's; and playing too many suited and connected hands.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-25-2007, 10:51 AM
SodaSurfer SodaSurfer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 20
Default Re: 6 Player vs. 9 Player Tables

Thanks everyone for your comments! I should have stated I was more interested in No Limit, but do play Limit about 20% of the time. I'm also at the Micro Stakes.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-26-2007, 09:44 PM
sweeng8 sweeng8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 246
Default Re: 6 Player vs. 9 Player Tables

This question bothers me a lot as for the life of me I cant seem to make the transition from full ring to 6 max in my cash games? It may be just bad luck, but I always seem to get hammered when I play shorthanded cash games. Playing S&Gs it isnt a problem- I feel comfortable playing any size in a tournie, but I would love to feel confident playing short handed cash tables
Am I missing anything or am I just running bad when im playing? If I can play short handed tournies, why do I struggle in short handed cash games?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.