|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
I've heard this sentiment expressed so much in various threads that I thought it would be a good idea to have a separate thread devoted to this subject. I think the wide consensus is that apart from a couple of moments, HSP3 is a huge disappointment. I'm curious to know what people think were the mistakes made in producing this season.
In my own opinion, I think that the producers invited way too many players. I don't mind having Golds or Ramdins that much, you always need a sucker or two at the table. However, trying to squeeze too many players into too little time breaks up the continuity of the show. We have no idea how most players are really doing, and how their session is going, because we see them play at most half a dozen hands over the two episodes where they appear. What are other people's thoughts as to the reasons for this season being a dud? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
i don't think its a dud at all. i could of lived without the no-names but they all seem to have left, and i look forward to watching the "ultimate" table form.
i don't see how its changed much. i still like it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
The table selection until just now has been pretty atrocious. I think when we get deep into the table forming now it will make up at least alittle bit for the rest of the season.
As you said, too many players as well. I think they should play longer sessions with the same table, maybe switching one or two people if somebody wants to leave. Having said that, it's still easily my favorite poker show on television. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
Seems like the big names are all involved in "group think" this time around. First two seasons everyone seemed to be making plays on each other, now everyone has tightened up somewhat, working off of a tricky image of past episodes.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
Why is HSP3 such a major disappointment?
Probably cause you were expecting too much |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
Yeah, if you invite nobodies, make them entertaining (cannot think of any, actually) or at least someone you can root for (Chamanara, for me).
These Shak and Trincher and what not folks are just so bland. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
[ QUOTE ]
Why is HSP3 such a major disappointment? Probably cause you were expecting too much [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, it's still the best poker show on TV by far. Everyone's expectations were too high. Sure there are lots of little things they could do to make it better, but it's pretty dang good as is. It would be better to have one lineup play longer. (I still wanna see "Live at the Bellagio" GOGOGO) It seems like everyone is disappointed there weren't any huge cooler hands; obv. the producers can't force that to happen. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
[ QUOTE ]
Why is HSP3 such a major disappointment? Probably cause you were expecting too much [/ QUOTE ] exactly, i wish people moaning on about it being a dissapointment would just stop watching/commenting about it |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
I don't think the show is a disappointment at all but i don't think the action has been as good. Part of that is the cards... there haven't been many huge situations and the other part is too many tight players make for a boring game. No one wants to take any risks or look foolish. The game imo is far more interesting when you have some action players or just plain bad players in it. I love having Sam Farha in the game he really opens it up.
The opening lineup was interesting for awhile with Gabe, and Gold, and basically a lot of weak players. Having guys who say like one word the whole time and stare seriously with their shades on like Wasicka are a waste of a seat. The conversation/needling/etc is one of the best parts of the show. The show is at it's best with Matusow / Sheiky / Farha / Doyle / Barry / Negraneau / Elezera. I would love to see some other older players get involved like Chip.. someone with some good stories to tell. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is HSP3 a major disappointment?
I don't call it a major disappointment. But it maybe hasn't had as many 'signature' moments yet. Season 1 had the BG/Farha AA vs KK hand, as well as Phil's overall donkishness highlighted by his beating BG into the pot with the worse hand.
Season 2 had the sick Quads vs FH hand between DN and Gus, Matusow being paid by the rest of the table not to leave and then obligingly bluffing off his stack. Also some very good and horribly unrewarded play by Esfandiari. Other than "LOL Donkaments", what have been the memorable incidents this year? I guess Sheiky breaking MM's glasses, and Gold's douchi/donkiness. Also, remember all the bitching about prop bets last season? This time next season we'll be wondering why S4 isn't as good as S3. |
|
|