|
|
#21
11-03-2007, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] easy b/f $410 [/ QUOTE ] edit: I'd also make it more pf being that A) we're oop and B) we're 425bb deep [/ QUOTE ] I thought of doing this, but I figured that would be obvious to a decent player if all the sudden by 3 bet was $60+ instead of $50. To me, it seemed like it would basically tell him I have a huge hand and he has very large implied odds to call. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah making it bigger preflop works only up to a certain stack size. Once you get really deep by making it bigger preflop you are just making ur reverse implied odds bigger. Tbh i think the best play preflop is to flat call unless villain is a huge retard that doesnt understand hand ranges 
|
|
#23
11-03-2007, 06:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
b/f was the first thing to come to mind
i suppose c/c isn't bad if you expect him to bluff a missed flush draw. i just cannot imagine KQ or AQ betting this river if checked to
|
|
#24
11-03-2007, 06:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
you should also consider 1/2 pot / call. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] against a guy i don't have history against there's no way I beat anything that raises a bet on the river
|
|
#25
11-03-2007, 06:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
I'm really unsure what you're expecting from this post. Obviously most people are going to say b/f.
What stands out the most to me is that you're 4+ buyins deep yet you are unable to provide any info on the guy. This is probably because you're multra-tabling (with or without hud); but if you're posting hands in MSNL and are trying to get better, then I just don't get that.
|
|
#26
11-03-2007, 06:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
hmm, surprised no one has said c/c yet. It would def depend on villiain, like if he was way passive then i would bet/fold, but i think vs a decently aggro player I would c/c [/ QUOTE ] el
|
|
#27
11-03-2007, 06:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] you should also consider 1/2 pot / call. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] against a guy i don't have history against there's no way I beat anything that raises a bet on the river [/ QUOTE ] I strongly disagree with this. Even against unknown if I were to lead for 1/2 pot I would def be calling a 3x/4x raise.
|
|
#28
11-03-2007, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
without reads anything besides betting is pretty awful, imo. this is why you like playing [censored] players deep.
he is checking behind a lot hands. you get to value bet him to death. he doesn't bluff, ever, if you bet. he rarely bluffs if you check. he rarely bets for value with a hand you beat if you check. players at this level suck at playing deep, big pots so you should take advantage of this by extracting max value in these situations.
|
|
#29
11-03-2007, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you should also consider 1/2 pot / call. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] against a guy i don't have history against there's no way I beat anything that raises a bet on the river [/ QUOTE ] I strongly disagree with this. Even against unknown if I were to lead for 1/2 pot I would def be calling a 3x/4x raise. [/ QUOTE ] never, ever, ever.
|
|
#30
11-03-2007, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] hmm, surprised no one has said c/c yet. It would def depend on villiain, like if he was way passive then i would bet/fold, but i think vs a decently aggro player I would c/c [/ QUOTE ] el [/ QUOTE ] oops sorry
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
