#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
Fold. And I disagree with you, djk, folding 44 here is fine too. Raising it is straight up bad and open shoving, though marginally +EV, is ridiculously high variance and something we should avoid. It's taken me a looooong time to realize this. [/ QUOTE ] You might get a ban warning from a mod for posting advice to pass up a +cEV spot to preserve your tournament life on this forum. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges? [/ QUOTE ] Played with calling ranges for remaining 4 from 10% --> 100%, I think min +EV was 0.5%. Argh, [censored] me. Had BB set wrong. No, it's not unexploitable. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges? [/ QUOTE ] Played with calling ranges for remaining 4 from 10% --> 100%, I think min +EV was 0.5%. Argh, [censored] me. Had BB set wrong. No, it's not unexploitable. [/ QUOTE ] I just ran some numbers with SNGPT, shoving is either very slightly -cEV or very slightly +cEV throughout some reasonable calling ranges, it's extremely marginal. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
Raising... is ridiculously high variance and something we should avoid. It's taken me a looooong time to realize this. [/ QUOTE ] sigh, yes, sure, whatever but then there are situations depending on structure, field size, field strength, etc, etc. so say it depends if you're going to go with that argument. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
Shoving is neutral EV if people are calling anything wider is -EV.
88+,AQo+,ATs. I might raise fold at a tight table. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
on another note 0evg0 where r u getting your bankroll from? i havent seen any sweat thread from you forever and yet you keep playing these big buy in tourneys.
Oh and no this is not to be mean i really want to know if you are a cash player now or something. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
lol yes, i've been playing cash for the last 8 months or so. i only play the big lottery donkaments now really
and i don't really see any reason to make sweat threads unless it's something meaningful like a big weekly tournament or something |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
on another note 0evg0 where r u getting your bankroll from? [/ QUOTE ] |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] on another note 0evg0 where r u getting your bankroll from? [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] 1. involves flashing lights and loud noises 2. think i'm a winning player at it 3. turns out it's actually rigged 4. pisses me off to no end 5. waiting on that one big payday I COULD BE TALKING ABOUT POKER OR STACKER! |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
The shove isnt even close to unexploitable. I'd open fold 44 too, also not even close to being unexploitable.
|
|
|