#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
To give results on the OP, I shoved and got called by AK
I had an eerily similar hand just today, and I still wasnt sure what to do because alot of the advice in this thread was conflicting Prima Network No-Limit Hold'em, $10.00 BB (5 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com BB ($1408.00) Hero ($922.00) MP ($1170.75) Button ($1428.00) SB ($2274.75) Preflop: Hero is UTG with T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $35</font>, MP calls $35, Button calls $35, SB calls $30, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $206</font>, Hero?? Main Villain is 21/16/3.67 datamined, no history Callers in between are 48/24/2, 20/15/2 and 21/17/3 Anybody think this hand is different or have more thoughts on this spot? I think folding is sooo weak. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
[ QUOTE ]
He could have QJs+ and 88+ here. Usually that many callers = lots of suited connectors and small pairs. I'd shove over him. TT against a 30/23's 4 handed reraising range is like 60/40. [/ QUOTE ] I think suited connectors and small pairs are the least likely hands he'd be making this move with. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
For those saying fold in the OP, is calling or 4-betting better if villian has shown propensity to squeeze in this session?
|
|
|