#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55 $ Stars, isolating fish with 67s on button
Yeah he may fold to a club on river i don't think he's folding to a 5 or T. Even if we think that he's folding to river clubs it's still right to call(we need 1-6.6 but we get like 1-6.1. predicting he'll call like %50 or %30 of the time on club river 1-6.1 is good). But our play seems more like TT-AA here or maybe AK of clubs. Besides i don't think i'm folding with these odds.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55 $ Stars, isolating fish with 67s on button
In Villain's spot, I'm never folding on any rivers.
God knows a fish sure isn't. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55 $ Stars, isolating fish with 67s on button
i mean flat calling turn and folding brick river might be weak sauce but i think shoving the turn with no FE makes the sauce considerably weaker.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55 $ Stars, isolating fish with 67s on button
with that weak ass turn lead im just saying its not as automatic as you guys are making it out to be. especially if its a club
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55 $ Stars, isolating fish with 67s on button
Thanks for the replies. So my first mistake was making this preflop raise against a calling station. Play might be fine if limper is a tight player. Also the blinds were too high for my stack, play might be fine if bb = 50.
What about just calling preflop? I generally dont like to play passive, but since raising and contibetting takes 1/3 of my stack calling might be better in this spot. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55 $ Stars, isolating fish with 67s on button
i like calling on turn if we hit hell payoff but if we miss we save 1400 .end of story short and simple.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55 $ Stars, isolating fish with 67s on button
oh by the way i like a bigger raise to get blinds out. we want to isolate(even w our crap) too many hands we lose bluff power.
|
|
|