#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
I call PF almost every time. Almost always bet the flop, and almost always call a c/r against a player like that. Almost always check the turn, and call most rivers. Not sure it's best, especially checking the turn. Here it probably is but I'm sure I do too much checking in similar spots, just for an easy life.
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
if this would be party 2/4 3/6, i'd bet and call his shove with a smile, because atm most laggish regs are like "Oh i could have the 9 by c/c the flop, i must rep it here and check/shove any2 100% of the time"
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
[ QUOTE ]
if this would be party 2/4 3/6, i'd bet and call his shove with a smile, because atm most laggish regs are like "Oh i could have the 9 by c/c the flop, i must rep it here and check/shove any2 100% of the time" [/ QUOTE ] this is similar to why i think ive been playing breakeven. i try and make these moves vs tag regs, they always call. whenever tag regs make these moves vs me, i think 'that would be a good time to make a move on me with the board pairing, lets call' but as they are taggy they always have the 9. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
Poker Stars
No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $5/$10 5 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $1407.25 CO: $676 Button: $2103.75 SB: $510 TWP: $1715.15 Pre-flop: (5 players) TWP is BB with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3 folds, <font color="#cc0000">SB raises to $40</font>, TWP calls. Flop: 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($80, 2 players) SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">TWP bets $55</font>, SB calls. Turn: 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($190, 2 players) SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">TWP bets $120</font>, <font color="#cc0000">SB raises all-in $415</font>, TWP calls. River: 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($1020, 1 player + 1 all-in - Main pot: $1020) Results: Final pot: $1020 <font color="#ffffff">SB showed Ad Qd</font> <font color="#ffffff">TWP mucks Js Ks</font> |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
wow pretty gross play by villain
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
what do you think of my line? reasonable?
edit: also proof of TWP Theorem - the worse they play, the more they win. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
i mean... i guess...
i honestly like b/f more than b/c on the turn, but I think you had a pretty good read on villain |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
yea, i had the read that everyone sucks, no one ever has anything, and if they play their hand they're bluffing.
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
his turn c/r is disgusting but his flop call isn't *that* horrible - he's prob 50/50 with your range, the question is can he turn a profit on the turn/river
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 play-along vs a reg
Oops, i voted b/f turn but just realized the stack sizes making it bad imo.
I like how you played everystreet and i'd play it the same. |
|
|