Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:53 AM
fslexcduck fslexcduck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 4,531
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

then shove over any turn bet in that case. i dont know if that's what u did but that's what u should do.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:57 AM
fslexcduck fslexcduck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 4,531
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

one more thing is SB is not fish but just reg or something, i check this flop back with this type of player this deep who's liable to c/r a ton of [censored] a fair amount of the time. with fish in tho you lose too much value i guess
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:03 AM
luegofuego luegofuego is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: degen in the rye
Posts: 1,597
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

yeah i shoved, he had 85. anyway if he WAS full of [censored], im fairly certain he would fire turn anyway. and thats like hundreds and hundreds of dollars we are missing out on by threebetting flop. like i guess that if u had some weird fetish that u just HAD to re-rebluff dudes on suspicious boards, u could re-raise with AA here to balance but i think doing that constantly is pretty awful. so i like the floating more.

god im tired.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:05 AM
luegofuego luegofuego is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: degen in the rye
Posts: 1,597
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

if my rhetorics are a bit fuzzy, its because i just played 13k hands with no rest in between. i cant think straight.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:06 AM
luegofuego luegofuego is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: degen in the rye
Posts: 1,597
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

btw im not arguing that its an easy stack-off, it was just a checkup. 3bet vs float is what interests me now.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:09 AM
fsuplayer fsuplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Guy\'s a pro.
Posts: 7,780
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

[ QUOTE ]
yeah i shoved, he had 85. anyway if he WAS full of [censored], im fairly certain he would fire turn anyway. and thats like hundreds and hundreds of dollars we are missing out on by threebetting flop. like i guess that if u had some weird fetish that u just HAD to re-rebluff dudes on suspicious boards, u could re-raise with AA here to balance but i think doing that constantly is pretty awful. so i like the floating more.

god im tired.

[/ QUOTE ]

instead of hoping to get his $300 turn cont bet and trying to decide which turns and rivers hit his range, we can get $1100+ in with dominated hands and draws that have alot less equity than they might think (like KJcc)

we have the nuts on this board and im trying to get it in asap
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:19 AM
luegofuego luegofuego is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: degen in the rye
Posts: 1,597
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

u make it sound like the one half of a buyin is unimportant. it's HALF A BUYIN. and if we have the nuts on this board, there shouldnt really be that many turn cards dangerous enough to change our opinion of our hand that much imo.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:21 AM
mo42nyy mo42nyy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

[ QUOTE ]
yeah i shoved, he had 85. anyway if he WAS full of [censored], im fairly certain he would fire turn anyway. and thats like hundreds and hundreds of dollars we are missing out on by threebetting flop. like i guess that if u had some weird fetish that u just HAD to re-rebluff dudes on suspicious boards, u could re-raise with AA here to balance but i think doing that constantly is pretty awful. so i like the floating more.

god im tired.

[/ QUOTE ]

you werent drawing dead what more could you want
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:34 AM
EC10 EC10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: not folding
Posts: 2,471
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

i agree with fsu.

on a slightly related note: fsu, what do you think of this theory i have that people who have played a lot of hands on UB are far better poker players than people who haven't
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-26-2007, 11:39 PM
cts cts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag

[ QUOTE ]
what do you think of this theory i have that people who have played a lot of hands on UB are far better poker players than people who haven't

[/ QUOTE ]

this is def true but not just ub, for all sites. ppl who only play a certain site are significantly worse in my experience because they haven't learned how to beat a whole bunch of different types of players, and that learning experience is key to getting really good at poker. the opposition at ub for example is just completely different from stars. even ftp is pretty different from stars. when the stars guys come to ftp or the ftp guys go to stars they usually get brutalized for a bit before they adjust.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.