|
|
#1
04-18-2007, 11:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
$3.40 PS 10-seat: small overpair vs. all-in. . . .
I don't feel real good about this one. . . . How do you decide whether or not to make this call? It was close, as a call and lose doesn't really put me in that bad a position.
PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t100 (8 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com UTG (t1125) UTG+1 (t245) MP1 (t1645) Hero (t4225) CO (t2030) Button (t1850) SB (t1130) BB (t2750) Preflop: Hero is in MP2 with 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="gray">UTG folds</font>, <font color="gray">UTG+1 folds</font>, <font color="gray">MP1 folds</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to t200</font>, <font color="gray">CO folds</font>, Button calls t200, <font color="gray">SB folds</font>, <font color="gray">BB folds</font>(pot at 550) Flop: (t550) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 players) <font color="red">Hero bets t400</font>, <font color="red">Button raises to t1650 (All-in)</font>, <font color="gray">Hero folds</font>(pot at 2600, facing a 1250 call) 
|
|
#4
04-18-2007, 11:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $3.40 PS 10-seat: small overpair vs. all-in. . . .
that's funny, I actually thought if anything I should have just limped. I thought the raise was technically incorrect, but that with these table conditions it may limit the field or even give me a cheap steal.
are you sure about raising a middle pair in mid pos with 8 players and blinds not particularly high?
|
|
#5
04-18-2007, 11:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $3.40 PS 10-seat: small overpair vs. all-in. . . .
Thought the blinds were 100/200 for some reason.
No then I like 250-300 better. I would be reluctant to put more money into the pot after being called though. Not sure what the right move is either and I dont think you quite get the odds you need to call here and I think you are behind villain.
|
|
#6
04-18-2007, 11:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $3.40 PS 10-seat: small overpair vs. all-in. . . .
As the other posters said I would raise more preflop. As played I would never fold here. Even if villain has an overpair you're just an ~40/60 underdog.
|
|
#7
04-18-2007, 11:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $3.40 PS 10-seat: small overpair vs. all-in. . . .
[ QUOTE ]
As the other posters said I would raise more preflop. As played I would never fold here. Even if villain has an overpair you're just an ~40/60 underdog. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#8
04-18-2007, 11:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $3.40 PS 10-seat: small overpair vs. all-in. . . .
I think i would fold pf here, if you get called once you standard raise there will be flopped over a ton making post flop difficult to play and you are not priced for a set. I also wouldn't limp cause you are not deep enough for playing for set value, so i would fold.
Post flop dont fold
|
|
#10
04-18-2007, 12:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $3.40 PS 10-seat: small overpair vs. all-in. . . .
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As the other posters said I would raise more preflop. As played I would never fold here. Even if villain has an overpair you're just an ~40/60 underdog. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Is that right? I thought an overpair would have you as a 4:1 dog, 80-20? you sure aren't getting 4:1... I agree that this is a fold, if he was on a shorter stack say 7-8 bb instacall, but there's no reason to risk the luxury of a big stack on this kinda situation, even if you're ahead its not by much
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
