|
|
#101
11-13-2007, 04:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
Eternal, what made you moving down to NL200? Seems like you were playing 14/10 before and now you are playing 16/12.
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] For those that are confused, Narena's results are in BB/100, not in ptbb/100. Just divide the results by 2 if you want to compare apples to apples. [/ QUOTE ] WTF!!! you're kidding right? I haven't done the math but im going to right now!! [/ QUOTE ] omfg, it's true. All along i thought this was 6ptbb/100...I'm sorry Narena, but I was really impressed with your graph before mainly because of your small pfr % I didn't realize this was only bb/100.  THE BOTS HAVE OVER +4ptbb/100!? How did i not see this before!!?!? lol [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#103
11-13-2007, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
yah, 22+,AJ+,KQs==10% how sad is it I know that by heart? [/ QUOTE ] It's fricking awesome to know this by heart, I try to do it as often as possible to practice preflop ranges. You know instantly when someone says one that is too small also.
|
|
#104
11-13-2007, 04:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
Quick way to do it on the fly...1326 hand combos. So 132 hands is about 10%. 6 ways to make a pair...16 to make an unpaired hand (4 suited, 12 unsuited).
|
|
#106
11-13-2007, 04:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
No, no, no. You misunderstand. I'm a huge too eazy fan. Great content + great humor. I'm still laughing about the sample of a million nits. I'm very close to asking my local cable company for a too eazy channel.
[ QUOTE ] pairs plus AK = (13*.45) + 1.2 = 7.05 +AQ = 8.25 +KQ = 9.45 +AJs = 9.85 [/ QUOTE ] Ok, he's running ~9 UTG, so he gets AQ too + a few bluff raises. In any case, tight.
|
|
#107
11-13-2007, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
jesus eternal that is sick(was it on fulltilt? since that seems like its a sick soft 1/2 field i guess lol) [/ QUOTE ] Yeah that's why i nearly fell out of my chair when I saw that list and seeing their winrates thinking it was PTBB.
|
|
#108
11-13-2007, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
No, no, no. You misunderstand. I'm a huge too eazy fan. Great content + great humor. I'm still laughing about the sample of a million nits. I'm very close to asking my local cable company for a too eazy channel. [ QUOTE ] pairs plus AK = (13*.45) + 1.2 = 7.05 +AQ = 8.25 +KQ = 9.45 +AJs = 9.85 [/ QUOTE ] Ok, he's running ~9 UTG, so he gets AQ too + a few bluff raises. In any case, NOT tight. [/ QUOTE ] FYP
|
|
#109
11-13-2007, 05:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
OK, so tight is old school live game JJ+,AK? I'm not going to out-nit anyone by any stretch of the imagination (they don't call me ActionStan for nothin'), but pairs + AK + occasionally some other hands at least seems "comfortably snug". I take it you disagree?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
