AP infinity plus one - New AP Statement

[RagzMaster]

They are doing a complete investigation, yet dont even have the hand histories from a month ago??

This makes me want to puke.

So anyone who was ripped off more then a month ago has no recourse since all files have vanished. Shocking.

The cheating there is not a new thing. Wake up people.

[PartyGirlUK]

[ QUOTE ]
it seems vv staged to me as well

[/ QUOTE ]

[N 82 50 24]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
1) Date of the 'conversation with AP support'.
2) Name of that member of AP support.
3) What exactly Nat received (screen shots, forwarded emails, transcripts, etc)

[/ QUOTE ]
Mark sent me the conversation 3 days ago or so. I sent you pretty much what I received other than some email correspondence. The guy who he was talking to is some support guy in South Korea , I don't think his name is relevant.

[/ QUOTE ]

This seems somehow strange to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why? That's where their software company is from.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yea, it is not strange. It's pretty well-known that they have people in South Korea either working for them or somehow contracting for them.

[Synergistic Explosions]

[ QUOTE ]
foiled! if only jack bauer had gotten to "AP Support Guy" before Seif had him delete the incriminating files.

[/ QUOTE ]

Augie, you should probably retract or edit this statement. You could get sued by Mark for this.

[sheetsworld]

payup was aug 22 btw

sheets

[Spiff]

[ QUOTE ]
Seriously though...does anyone else think that that convo seems fabricated?

[/ QUOTE ]
yes

[LuckyMux]

Nat,

I meant 'in what format'? Is it just a transcript? And is it dated?

The obvious point being, 'how can we possibly know that conversation is authentic and unedited?'

It's from Mark Seif, ffs. The only court on Earth that would accept that as reliable evidence is in Guantanemo Bay.

The upshot is: no hand histories. The rest is merely sound and fury, signifying nothing.

And legal threats again? Oh, dear. I think Dan is the one who can be talking to m'learned friends here, not Mr Seif. 'LIAR', he called him if I recall correctly. In capitals, no less.

I urge you to go back to the beginning and retrace this affair step by step, imagining Mark Seif is 100% innocent of any wrongdoing as you do so.

Then try it again but, this time, imagine Mr Seif is up to his neck in it from day one.

See which scenario you think best fits the evidence.

I have.

[augie_]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
foiled! if only jack bauer had gotten to "AP Support Guy" before Seif had him delete the incriminating files.

[/ QUOTE ]

Augie, you should probably retract or edit this statement. You could get sued by Mark for this.

[/ QUOTE ]

damn. i don't want to get sued [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] i would like to retract that statement. or can i change "Seif" to "President Logan?"

[highhustla]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
it seems vv hilarious to me as well

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Mark, you are a scum-sucking piece of garbage. We have plenty of evidence. Take me to court, bitch.

BTW, why didn't you take C's advice and just do the following?

[ QUOTE ]
AP Support Guy says (11:23 PM):
and explain that once you had that ability to see other players' whole cards, you would continue to use them up until recently
AP Support Guy says (11:24 PM):
and the recent hand histories would reveal that you didn't have that capability

[/ QUOTE ]

L
O
L

[Victor]

that chat is gold. the best part is how they are so amazed and insulted that ppl are questioning ap's integrity.