Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-07-2007, 05:54 PM
manupod manupod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: God, it\'s time for the curing
Posts: 499
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video

CTS 3bet 65o, he bet the AK8 flop in position and shoved the 7 turn, saying the guy (krantz actually) folds often enough to make it plus ev, and he had like 18% equity when called.

In my hand (like in CTS) we figure to get called a lot and have a draw in a spot where taking the free card makes some sense. But w/ the flushdraw, gutter and maybe a live overcard if he calls w/ QJ or something, I have pretty good equity, and he argued that combined w/ fold equity (i've got to think i have some on this A turn) shove>checking

?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:34 PM
Burcak Burcak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 154
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you're not cts.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

so????

I dunno exactly what OP is refering to, but why would it work for CTS and not OP?

I mean if you have enough F/E in the shove to make up for calling and losing then its obv a good play. And like we are quite live if called...

Also, for most people I do not think this is a snap call with an underpair.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you are not cts kinda means, since you are not him, you can't really determine whether or not it is +ev to shove.

I must also add that I really don't like everyone going "playing my first orbit, he is 52/15/6 over 80 hands" instead of "I don't usually pay attention". And "it was a misclick" instead of "I was bored of getting pushed around so I decided to call and couldn't give up on the pot". Or "pf raise was a misclick" instead of "I want badly to be called with my AA".

Not that I am sure it is not a misclick. But people misclick a lot more often in the hands posted here than I see on the tables.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:50 PM
Melchiades Melchiades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norway (London currently)
Posts: 5,040
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video

People do float AK from time to time guys, even when they shouldn't. So if you are all instacalling with KK/QQ as villain you will see the pot shipped the other way fairly often when you add in sets and AJ.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:00 PM
_Sundance _Sundance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 30
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video


Like the CTS referenced hand, I think this could be a good example of a turn bet that needs a small fold% to be +ve ev given villians likely calling range and frequencies.

I say could be because you really need to know your opps cbet tendencies in raised pots and ideally you need to know how he views your preflop call (I alomost always fold here btw).

Readless, I would guess that 22/17 could well have 99+/AJ+/some suited connectors for his 3bet. Assuming he cbets most of the hopeless hands then your bet is a must.

If he always calls with a hand like QQ your move is slightly +ve ev (6bbs). With KK/AK you are only slightly -ve (10bbs).

So, if you think he's only 3betting with JJ+/AJ+ and always calling here then check. If you think he's a bit wider than that and/or may fold QQ/KK then push it.

If he does call then you've messed with his head for future hands as he now thinks you are an idiot and you should be able to adjust for this better than him since you know that you are not [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:16 PM
Clever Nickname Clever Nickname is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video

I think a shove here can be pretty good, but it is a bit opponent specific; some players would fire again at that ace with air, some would just check/fold. That said, you have 12 squeaky clean outs here, which means (math hidden because typing it all out would suck) if he folds 33% of the time, this play is +EV, and against a 22/17's reraising range I think you can get him to fold at least that much. It's also possible that your king or queen outs may even be good, which would give you even better odds.

Now, just because a shove here is (probably) +EV, does that make it more +EV than checking behind and trying to hit something? I have no idea. But if you do get called, it will probably be great for your image.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:22 PM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video

well i mean, once you get to the turn, ya shove. floating in rr-ed pots requires deeper stacks and a decent read.

also yeah, if he can hand read at all, he should snap you. the ace changed little.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:34 PM
KRANTZ KRANTZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the 1980s
Posts: 4,999
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video

the hand in that cardrunners vid that cole played vs me is slightly similar to this but ultimately too dissimilar to really compare the two situations.

here, you have a 3-bet pot in a 6handed game - there, you had a 4-bet pot in a very aggressive HU match.

in this hand, you're probably getting called damn often. someone should do the math on the EV of the shove, but barring that, you floated the flop, now have over 10 outs and it's good for your image to splash around like this now and then.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:43 PM
Snipe Snipe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Annihilation Method FTW
Posts: 765
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video

[ QUOTE ]
People do float AK from time to time guys, even when they shouldn't. So if you are all instacalling with KK/QQ as villain you will see the pot shipped the other way fairly often when you add in sets and AJ.

[/ QUOTE ]

With the amount of retards 3betting ATC from the blinds @ NL200, I'm fine with this.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:59 PM
Speedlimits Speedlimits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,780
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video

pf is fine/standard against light 3bettors.

this line is pretty good. shoving flop and folding are both viable options as well.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-07-2007, 08:12 PM
deaders deaders is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Perth, AU
Posts: 3,362
Default Re: CTS did something like this in his video

this is much better and pretty standard if you were the pf 3 bettor and flop aggressor, as it is you should get called a lot unless he has complete air. But if the guy is any good he should have bet the turn with air so its not looking great.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.