Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 10-08-2007, 02:41 PM
pokervintage pokervintage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 220
Default Is Poker Playing a better test for would be presidents?

Let's look at an iteresting comparison between the games of chess and poker. Big Blue beat Kasparov. A computer has yet to beat a pro poker player. (By pro I do not mean Phil Laak or some other purely tournament player).

I believe that one difference between the two games is that chess can be learned and one can play at an expert level by following previously developed procedures. Poker can also be learned but when faced with a decision things learned in the past concerning similar situations are not as valuable as they are in chess. One must reason continuously to be an expert poker player and not follow some mechanical procedure.

pokervintage
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.