Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-03-2007, 04:55 AM
tom10167 tom10167 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Collectin stars from the sky
Posts: 8,811
Default \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

"I call."
Mayhem insues.


What's the ruling?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2007, 06:13 AM
Yo'Maha Yo'Maha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Land of the Donkeys
Posts: 229
Default Re: \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

[ QUOTE ]
"I call."
Mayhem insues.


What's the ruling?

[/ QUOTE ]

I know at the California Casinos, if you had him covered and he stated "all-in", he's all-in regardless of his ability to count.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2007, 07:16 AM
tom10167 tom10167 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Collectin stars from the sky
Posts: 8,811
Default Re: \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

That's what was ruled here too, it felt dirty to me though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2007, 10:50 AM
punkass punkass is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hip deep in pie
Posts: 4,695
Default Re: \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

yea, he's an idiot. He is definitely all in for what he has in front of him. "All in" has only one option, and that's for all his chips, despite what he thinks he has.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2007, 11:01 AM
deucedeuce00 deucedeuce00 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MINRAISING YOU
Posts: 611
Default Re: \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

LOL at guy not knowing how much money he has infront of him.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2007, 11:05 AM
rageotones rageotones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: panhandlin\'
Posts: 1,484
Default Re: \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

he probably knew how much he had but just meant to bet 700. he should have learned his lesson about saying the words "all in" at the 1/2 table. it's much cheaper.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-03-2007, 11:20 AM
danzasmack danzasmack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DYNAMO HARSHBART
Posts: 7,370
Default Re: \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

Pretty sure the rule is that the player has to go all in for all his $ and the guy that calls can reconsider now that he knows how much he went all in for. This is because the amount he is calling is actually much higher than what he thought he was calling.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-03-2007, 11:25 AM
SellingtheDrama SellingtheDrama is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 712
Default Re: \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

Just ask the dealer "How much is he in for".

If you don't like the answer, call the floor.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-03-2007, 12:15 PM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: No longer losing money bluffing
Posts: 19,943
Default Re: \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

pretty sure he is the dealer
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-03-2007, 01:35 PM
CSuave CSuave is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12
Default Re: \"I\'m all in for $700(He actually has $1500)

Well there are some that will shoot this angle to get someone to call a bigger bet than they would have. But before anyone says "I call" they better make sure they know the exact amount. Both players acted poorly. But unfortunately the statements of "all in" and "I call" are the only two statements that matter and are binding.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.