|
View Poll Results: Did Sniper act inappropriately in banning el diablo? | |||
Yes | 25 | 75.76% | |
No | 5 | 15.15% | |
Don't know/Don't care | 3 | 9.09% | |
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
I approve of this BTYS story, any haters can direct their hate at me, leave BTYS alone.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
[ QUOTE ]
I approve of this BTYS story, any haters can direct their hate at me, leave BTYS alone. [/ QUOTE ] Conspire eats babies. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
I never thought you fluctuated between pariah and barely acceptable. I thought you fluctuated between barely acceptable and dead sexy.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
LOL @ ham nog.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
this comic costs $10
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
I only have three. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
i don't see how this will appease the dids. now he's just going to molest on christmas eve like a real santa would
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
Ham nog was uber! Sweet Simpsons reference too. I eagerly await the next installment.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
dont poke the bear...
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How the Dids Stole Christmas, Pt. 1: Expulsion
C for this one
|
|
|