#101
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The opposite of JVs largest loss thread
Blinds.. Those are the size the blinds. Stox is a pretty damn high NL and Limit Player. Odds are it was 25/50 NL and 50/100 NL. If not, he's a pretty amazing player for winning that much at 100 NL (max buyin) and 50 NL (max buyin tables) and I'd like to know his secrets.
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The opposite of JVs largest loss thread
[ QUOTE ]
Those showdown numbers are unlike anything i have seen over this large a sample. It really makes me wish i had the time/spare money to be coached by stox. [/ QUOTE ] and combined with his W$WSF what you have is a WTFFF????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????? |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The opposite of JVs largest loss thread
That's just characteristic of a short handed game, %W$SD is more interesting
|
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The opposite of JVs largest loss thread
Rotterdaum: His WSD/W$SD relation is pretty astounding too.
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The opposite of JVs largest loss thread
[ QUOTE ]
That's just characteristic of a short handed game, %W$SD is more interesting [/ QUOTE ] you dont understand poker |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The opposite of JVs largest loss thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Extrapolate my last two weeks out into 223k hands and I win? [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] cue baronzeus 300/600 pic [/ QUOTE ] Just because I need to 1up everything schneids does: THX I WIN [/ QUOTE ] jesus, you luck sack |
|
|