|
|
#11
01-30-2007, 03:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quik theory question (i think)
[ QUOTE ]
i'd make it 4x to just take it down there i know when i'm in the bb a 3x raise looks much more tempting to call than a 4x i should add if i'm in the sb and you're in the bb i would raise 3x because i'm looking to play more pots with the fish [/ QUOTE ] ie yourself? 
|
|
#12
01-30-2007, 03:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: quik theory question (i think)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i'd make it 4x to just take it down there i know when i'm in the bb a 3x raise looks much more tempting to call than a 4x i should add if i'm in the sb and you're in the bb i would raise 3x because i'm looking to play more pots with the fish [/ QUOTE ] ie yourself? [/ QUOTE ] p.s. i had sex with your mom
|
|
#13
01-30-2007, 04:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: quik theory question (i think)
I like to raise a little bigger OOP regardless of my holding. I usually just count the BB as a limper and round up. For instance if I'm SB and 2 limpers (assume NL 600), I'll raise it to 40 or so.
|
|
#14
01-30-2007, 04:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: quik theory question (i think)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i'd make it 4x to just take it down there i know when i'm in the bb a 3x raise looks much more tempting to call than a 4x i should add if i'm in the sb and you're in the bb i would raise 3x because i'm looking to play more pots with the fish [/ QUOTE ] ie yourself? [/ QUOTE ] 
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
