AP infinity plus one - New AP Statement - Page 22

Lord_Summerisle · #**211** 10-25-2007, 03:09 AM

All of you are missing the obvious: MONEY

Companies are about MONEY. People who are making MONEY 'legitimately' are not going to allow some yahoos to jeapordize making lots of MONEY. There will be an example made - you pay if you screw powerful people out of their MONEY.

Capitola · #**212** 10-25-2007, 03:10 AM

[ QUOTE ]
However, I do think there is a significant possibility that one day they will run a completely secure site (from all angles) that will offer a 100% fair gaming experience. There is ALSO a significant possibility that they will never truly clean house

[/ QUOTE ]
If they don't clean house and more importantly show some transparency, I don't know how we can ever believe that they're running an honest site.

Kedu · #**213** 10-25-2007, 03:11 AM

[ QUOTE ]
All of you are missing the obvious: MONEY

Companies are about MONEY. People who are making MONEY 'legitimately' are not going to allow some yahoos to jeapordize making lots of MONEY. There will be an example made - you pay if you screw powerful people out of their MONEY.

[/ QUOTE ]

IP check?

bigshowmack · #**214** 10-25-2007, 03:13 AM

Is anyone else amused by the overabundance of references to how much of a [censored] Jenny Woo is in articles by her own employer?

I think its also hilarious how obviously hot she thinks she is. She's a really bad boob job past being just an average asian chick. Get over yourself Jenny.

PoorSkillz · #**215** 10-25-2007, 03:14 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I wonder why it took players of a poker FORUM, as oopsed to the "regulators" of the industy/site to pick up on the fact that there was blatent and extreamly obvious cheating going on?

Isn't the kawannee gaming commission supposed to be monitering this kind of thing?

This is a really big hit for the industry in my opinoin. If the people who are supposed to be monitering the industry (poker site/gaming commission) and preventing cheating are not doing their job, whos to say this is not going on elsewhere? And by people who are not as blatent and dumb as to be caught in the mannor that these people were?

[/ QUOTE ]

In Nevada casinos pay huge sums to the state in the form of taxes, so the state can afford to have a lot of investigators. The KGC gets only $10,000 per year from each gambling opearator, so they can't really monitor at each poker site thousands of players, day in and day out, for possible signs of cheating. As a practical matter, they must rely on reports of cheating, and they have a form for that mentioned on their website. They would have to charge hundreds of thousands of dollars per year for each gambling outfit to be able to conduct the kind of investigations you want them to conduct. And then they would have zero permittees, since none would pay that much for the right to run their servers out of that indian reservation.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sorry but I've been wondering this for awhile and I just had to ask. Do you live in Kahnawake?

Lord_Summerisle · #**216** 10-25-2007, 03:14 AM

Yeah, you got me. If anyone suggests that AP has everything to gain by cleaning things up, must be one of them.

Kedu · #**217** 10-25-2007, 03:21 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, you got me. If anyone suggests that AP has everything to gain by cleaning things up, must be one of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

Post this on your real account then hoe. The only example being made is scott tom running to the hills of panama to get away.

ibluffoldladies · #**218** 10-25-2007, 03:23 AM

So, the issue of this "consultant" who got caught, yet, not prosecuted, intrigues me. Anybody else?

Lord_Summerisle · #**219** 10-25-2007, 03:24 AM

hoe says this isn't my real account?

h11 · #**220** 10-25-2007, 03:26 AM

it was posted:

I just find it hilarious that it's so hard to determine the exact ownership structure at AP.

[/ QUOTE ]

Both sites and Joe Norton state that he owns 100% of the firms. It was very easy for us to determine that. What is apparently difficult for us is - to believe it.

It's not really surprising that we might have doubts, because this is a privately owned firm, and private owners are not required to reveal very much about their affairs. I own a business as a sole proprietor, just as Mr Norton claims he owns these gambling firms. If I sold someone an option to buy my firm, I'm not required to tell you about that, or to tell anyone else. That's just the way it is. Are you really amazed that I don't have to tell you about my business, or that you have no way of knowing if I have given someone a right to buy me out?