*** JANUARY 2007 Low Content Thread ***

[beset]

I keep having discrepancies between my session by session +/- results tracking in a spreadsheet and my monthly bottom line per pokertracker on full tilt. Is anyone noticing PT missing random hands on FTP?

[Troll_Inc]

[ QUOTE ]
I keep having discrepancies between my session by session +/- results tracking in a spreadsheet and my monthly bottom line per pokertracker on full tilt. Is anyone noticing PT missing random hands on FTP?

[/ QUOTE ]

I haven't been playing that close attention, but I can check it out. Is it both + and -? And I assume you don't have any sort of bonus that you are clearing or rakeback that is messing it up? And you don't have some sort of filter button checked, like more than x# players?

One specific thing I know has screwed me up in the past at FT for PT are the capped games...they get put in a separate set of games that look odd (like they are a higher limit) and you might not have checked for inclusion.

[Troll_Inc]

Latest PTO update

I didn't realize there was a "new" one out.

Included: "FIX - Full Tilt - added code to get the missing seating information that FT sometimes omits from the 1st hand played in a ring game session or tournament."

[cmyr]

FT is still very reliable for me, expect for when the client crashes. I check my +/- from pokertracker against another spreadsheet I keep listing the various monies i have at various sites, so I can see if there's any difference between pokertracker and the actual numbers and it's almost always spot on.

[beset]

thanks for thoughts troll and cmyr I am updated and everything. It appears that every once and a while it will miss a big pot and I can't figure it out. The two times I've noticed it its been after big multi-way all-in pots where i've drawn out on made hands. Maybe PT hates LAGS?

[GAL]

Love donks.

Full Tilt Poker
Pot Limit Omaha Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
6 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is UTG+1 with Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $7</font>, CO calls, 2 folds, BB calls.

Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($22, 3 players)
BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $22</font>, CO folds, BB calls.

Turn: T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($66, 2 players)
BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $54</font>, BB calls.

River: 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($174, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">BB bets $174</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero calls all-in $114</font>.
Uncalled bets: $60 returned to BB.

Results:
Final pot: $402
<font color="#ffffff">BB showed 2d 8d 6s 4s</font>
<font color="#ffffff">Hero showed Qs Td 7d Jd</font>

[beset]

2/4 and 3/6 mostly with some 15/30 and 30/60 LO8 also. No biggie just not a lot of fun. I'd complain about how I can't seam to win 60/40s right now but there is some monkey tilt in here so i deserve it. There is +1400 on a non pokertracker site also (one big pot) around 3454 so image that spike goes one grid higher [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[Troll_Inc]

[ QUOTE ]
2/4 and 3/6 mostly with some 15/30 and 30/60 LO8 also. No biggie just not a lot of fun. I'd complain about how I can't seam to win 60/40s right now but there is some monkey tilt in here so i deserve it.


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm beginning to think that the medium stakes 60/40 PLO methodology preached and practiced here is not the most sound strategy. You certainly are going to have much much more variance. Aren't there more sound ways to the same winrate?

[beset]

If you ran away from 60/40s in this game you would not have a win rate IMO. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[sahaguje]

What do you mean by 60/40s ?