|
|
#142
10-22-2007, 07:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hevad Kahn
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He's great and entertaining to watch. At least he is a character, even if you find him annoying. This isn't golf or tennis. It's poker. Get some emotion in there. It's getting old just seeing people stand up for all in's or saying "come on King". Televised Poker is about entertainment. [/ QUOTE ] It is not so great if you find him irritating which I did. Thank goodness for the mute button on my remote. [/ QUOTE ] Your finger got nowhere NEAR the mute button, even when Khan was doing his thing. You watched through it just like everyone else. [/ QUOTE ] This is a boldaggressive thing to say. I muted it every time Humberto or Hevad started with their bs. Why would you make such a dumb statement? Just curious. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#143
10-22-2007, 07:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hevad Kahn
[ QUOTE ]
Is this guy the biggest jerk in poker or what? Those stupid celebrations of his when he busts somebody look like he's having an epileptic seizure. It's kind of like the old football saying, when you get to the end zone act like you've been there before. I just saw the hand where he busted Humberto Brenes out of the Main Event. Until then, I thought that Humberto was the most classless POS in poker because of the way he acts when he busts somebody, but the way Kahn acted made Humberto look like a perfect gentleman. [/ QUOTE ] Here's what I would like to see: Seven players left. Khan knocks out Doyle Brunson and does his little happy dance. The rest of the table is Chip Reese, Dan Harrington, T.J. Cloutier, Howard Lederer, and last but not least, Todd Brunson. I'm sure they would all find it highly amusing.
|
|
#144
10-22-2007, 08:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hevad Kahn
[ QUOTE ]
Its not even close to being the same thing however. [/ QUOTE ] Because...? Or did you just want to make a statement without proving your point?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
