|
|
#41
12-27-2006, 04:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks
[ QUOTE ]
While my reasons for banning him aren't that he's a scammer... [/ QUOTE ] Ryan... if you didn't ban him for being Buster, for clarification, what was the reason for banning the FullRake account? 
|
|
#42
12-27-2006, 05:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks
[ QUOTE ]
Ryan... if you didn't ban him for being Buster, for clarification, what was the reason for banning the FullRake account? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 12/26/06 - Banned permanently for admitting to being busterstacks, posting private site information, and posting his intention to circumvent any future bans. -RB [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#43
12-27-2006, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ryan... if you didn't ban him for being Buster, for clarification, what was the reason for banning the FullRake account? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 12/26/06 - Banned permanently for admitting to being busterstacks, posting private site information, and posting his intention to circumvent any future bans. -RB [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Wait... so Ryan banned FullRake cause... some annonymous idiot Mod passed him information that was only available to Mods, and he posted it in open forum... ROFL Thanks for the good laugh Iron [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#44
12-27-2006, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks
[ QUOTE ]
Wait... so Ryan banned FullRake cause... some annonymous idiot Mod passed him information that was only available to Mods, and he posted it in open forum... ROFL Thanks for the good laugh Iron [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] It's not a joke, and you conveniently failed to address the other two reasons and FR's history. When someone comes back from a temp ban and announces that they essentially don't care about the site's wishes and intend to break the rules again in the future, obviously it was a mistake to only temp ban in the first place. When that same person posts private site information and is also BusterStacks, the ban is pretty much a no brainer.
|
|
#45
12-27-2006, 06:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks
I love how someone just bumped his thread in A/R from a year ago when he ran off with a bunch of cash. Does anyone see a reason not to lock it?
|
|
#46
12-27-2006, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks
[ QUOTE ]
Wait... so Ryan banned FullRake cause... some annonymous idiot Mod passed him information that was only available to Mods, and he posted it in open forum... ROFL Thanks for the good laugh Iron [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Clearly the same situation you [censored] dolt.
|
|
#47
12-27-2006, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks
[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone see a reason not to lock it? [/ QUOTE ] 1. Entertainment 2. Take some heat off for banning Full Rake, although that thread has been linked a few times. 3. Get people pissed off at FR so they'll rat out his next account.
|
|
#48
12-27-2006, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Wait... so Ryan banned FullRake cause... some annonymous idiot Mod passed him information that was only available to Mods, and he posted it in open forum... ROFL Thanks for the good laugh Iron [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] It's not a joke, and you overlooked the other two reasons and FR's other history. When someone comes back from a temp ban and announces that they essentially don't care about the site's wishes and intend to break the rules again in the future, obviously it was a mistake to only temp ban in the first place. When that same person posts private site information and is also BusterStacks, the ban is pretty much a no brainer. [/ QUOTE ] Spoil sport... Ryan, I agree its a concern that some Mods continue to anonymously pass Mod-info to posters and won't acknowledge that they did it here. However, I'm sure even you can see why I would find it funny that you would even note this, given your stance in other situations. fwiw, the differences in the situations duly noted, and I'm not questioning the ban [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#50
12-27-2006, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks
[ QUOTE ]
I love how someone just bumped his thread in A/R from a year ago when he ran off with a bunch of cash. Does anyone see a reason not to lock it? [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't lock it... I doubt it gets many more posts in A/R... a reminder that there are shady afiliates every now and then can't hurt.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
