Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > MOD DISCUSSION
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-27-2006, 01:31 AM
Ryan Beal Ryan Beal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,461
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

[ QUOTE ]
gl with the inevitable shitstorm ryan and PJN...

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you're overestimating how many people actually care about buster being able to post on 2+2. He's probably one of the only posters ever to be banned by extreme popular demand outside of an OOT survivor.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-27-2006, 01:36 AM
Gildwulf Gildwulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Blogging
Posts: 20,307
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
gl with the inevitable shitstorm ryan and PJN...

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you're overestimating how many people actually care about buster being able to post on 2+2.

[/ QUOTE ]

It doesn't matter about him in particular, people will use him as a martyr and hold him up as an example just like the rest. This will be Dan Bright all over again which is exactly what FR wants.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-27-2006, 01:37 AM
Gildwulf Gildwulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Blogging
Posts: 20,307
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

[ QUOTE ]
I'd say you have two hours until BBV finds out. Put some distance between yourself and your computer.

[/ QUOTE ]

well we have a leak in the mod forum so it is probably sooner than that
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-27-2006, 01:38 AM
Ryan Beal Ryan Beal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,461
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

[ QUOTE ]
It doesn't matter about him in particular

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it will absolutely matter to people. But if you'd like him unbanned, I'll at least consider it.

[ QUOTE ]
This will be Dan Bright all over again which is exactly what FR wants.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you don't think he should be banned, what's your solution? Or should we just let him stay and do absolutely nothing because we're afraid it might not be a popular decision?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-27-2006, 01:59 AM
Gildwulf Gildwulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Blogging
Posts: 20,307
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

let's just take this back to pm
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-27-2006, 02:09 AM
Jurollo Jurollo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,764
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

[ QUOTE ]
gw,

a list would look something like this:

durron, bluefeet, tigerite, gw, mat, nick, mh, and then i'd start having real honest to god difficulty thinking up mods i don't like, both because so many have done stupid [censored], and because i don't pay any attention to who the [censored] the mods are, and becausesome of them make too much damn money to be liked.

c

[/ QUOTE ]
Booooooooooo
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-27-2006, 12:15 PM
citanul citanul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: taking your lunch money
Posts: 11,179
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

[ QUOTE ]
let's just take this back to pm

[/ QUOTE ]

boo.

also, i think that it is in the nature of the bbv forum that you're going to wind up with this sort of problem, and going to have to deal with it. however it was handled pretty well with DB, so i'm sure you can handle it here. just hand out a lot of like 1 day bans once you've told people to knock it off.

c

edit: i just realized that the implication was again that full rake knew who hit the notify mod button *again.*

also, jurollo, obv you're my boy man, i just forget that you're not on vacation and all working for stars on the isle of man and stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-27-2006, 12:42 PM
iron81 iron81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Resident Donk
Posts: 6,806
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

I was a little off, but it looks like the [censored] is about to hit the fan.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-27-2006, 12:52 PM
Mat Sklansky Mat Sklansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,532
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

I don't believe anyone cares that much.

If there are posters out there who want Ryan and I to more carefully scrutinize the banning of any individual they should be directed to contact us privately.

Dead, for instance, during his brief appearance last week, implored those supporting him to contact me on his behalf. You know how many pms I got? ZERO.

I would predict the same results in this case, but if I'm wrong, I'll take a closer look.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-27-2006, 02:36 PM
Gildwulf Gildwulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Blogging
Posts: 20,307
Default Re: Food for thought - Busterstacks

i'm nipping it in the bud in this thread
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.