#2351
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
is it worth it to stay at a table if you have the jesus seat on a 60/10 fish with 100 BB's if the other 4 players are 19/16 and 29/24 solid players?
|
#2352
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
[ QUOTE ]
is it worth it to stay at a table if you have the jesus seat on a 60/10 fish with 100 BB's if the other 4 players are 19/16 and 29/24 solid players? [/ QUOTE ] the way the games are lately that's about as good as it gets. or maybe I table select bad. |
#2353
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
this hand was funny. my thought process is basically "this guy is crazy. aww [censored] I'll just put all in, maybe lose two buyins I dunno. [censored] he called. oh cool i have the best hand."
Full Tilt Poker, $1.50/$3 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 2 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter BB: $528.40 Hero (SB): $612 Pre-Flop: 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB) <font color="red">Hero raises to $9</font>, <font color="red">BB raises to $27</font>, Hero calls $18 Flop: ($54) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">BB bets $54</font>, Hero calls $54 Turn: ($162) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">BB bets $162</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $531 and is All-In</font>, BB calls $285.40 and is All-In River: ($1,056.80) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 is All-In) Results: $1,056.80 Pot ($0.50 Rake) BB showed 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (a pair of Sevens) and LOST (-$528.40 NET) Hero showed 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a pair of Eights) and WON $1,056.30 (+$527.90 NET) |
#2354
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
[ QUOTE ]
is it worth it to stay at a table if you have the jesus seat on a 60/10 fish with 100 BB's if the other 4 players are 19/16 and 29/24 solid players? [/ QUOTE ] Uh, 60/10 fish with 100bbs are the sole reason I join tables, I don't even care who else is sitting. It's not like this is 10/20 where cts sitting on your left will ruin your whole day regardless of how bad the other players are. |
#2355
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
you guys table select bad
|
#2356
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
Plz, I'm the biggest table selection nit on the planet. The jesus on a 60/10 is the best it gets these days.
|
#2357
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
YOU'RE A NIT??!?!? jk
Maybe I've been playing at the right times, but I still find tables with 3 idiots sitting. |
#2358
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
Well to be fair game selection is a lot better at 1/2 so this is prob still possible there. I've been playing 2/4 for awhile now. I'd still def sit at any table with a 60/10 at 1/2 though.
|
#2359
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
2/4 has been sick lately. I'm pretty sure I'm -EV at that level without some serious work. Lately I've been really getting the feeling that poker is going to die quite soon.
|
#2360
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: OCT (nc) *DELETED*
Also lately I've noticed a lot of the SSNL dudes who played 2-4 are now posting 1-2 hands. Jk3a, shpanko, casper maybe? I didn't want to ask, but have you all moved down b/c the games are just so bad?
|
|
|