#351
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Whenever I see these threads, I always open it up hoping that I'll see my name listed under the bad regs or ok regs or something (because I know I'm not one of the top), but despite the amount of hands I play, I don't see it [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]. Please someone just mention me!!! Anyways, I think needfood is easy to play against and everything, but I gotta give him props for having a solid winrate over the thousands of hands I have on him. Some other regs that I dont like to sit with ... frinkx tilt_donkey dangergirl foofchunk johnny_moxon (only because hes a shortstacker) ldonnie ... btw, I'm mmmbillski. I'm taking a break for a couple weeks, but I'll resume my reg status when I'm ready to come back [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] HOLLA BACK! i'm [censored] rebuiling at 100 now..... *sigh* [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] i was almost to 400 too... taking shots...... then i tilted [/ QUOTE ] that's you? i've always wondered who it was, and i've talked to a few other 2p2 regs and we have no read on you at all, you're like invisible |
#352
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i dunno...im nothing special...im pretty sure a 2ptbb/100 winner could go on that run at some point. not like bet would ever take place, just thought id warn u how suicidal that bet is. [/ QUOTE ] ya he plays higher anyway but fwiw i think the odds of like a 4-5 ptbb/100 winnner running at 8+ for 50k are longer than 15:1 [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] anyone wanna put a large amount of money on this???? |
#353
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
Any thoughts on me? I don't play much at Stars but was playing there from late July to early August. PIMP1111 at NL200.
|
#354
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty much convinced every 100NL regular sucks--too many Hellmuth vids I guess this thread is just a handjob for those at 100NL to feel like they are good as they toot everyone's horns... ie a circlejerk there is a reason they are at 100NL [/ QUOTE ] It's amazing how much softer NL100 is than NL200. Most NL200 regs would earn more at NL100. |
#355
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
MT2R shortstacks, so you obviously divide by 5
|
#356
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
MT2R shortstacks, so you obviously divide by 5 [/ QUOTE ] OHHHHHHH I GET IT NOW |
#357
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
kingofclubz is so annoying
and is biggmanny a fish or decent? cant get a read |
#358
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
kingofclubz is so annoying [/ QUOTE ] TY. Does he call everybody else here a donk all the time? He does to me constantly although in my case he's actually correct. |
#359
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i dunno...im nothing special...im pretty sure a 2ptbb/100 winner could go on that run at some point. not like bet would ever take place, just thought id warn u how suicidal that bet is. [/ QUOTE ] ya he plays higher anyway but fwiw i think the odds of like a 4-5 ptbb/100 winnner running at 8+ for 50k are longer than 15:1 [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Wait does that mean you'd give me something like 10:1 risking 50k to my 5k? |
#360
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
if you guys are serious about a bet, you should lay down some stipulations... amount of tables and/or given time person has to complete the 50k hands. obv 1tabling or so would take forever but really wouldnt be nearly as difficult as say 12 tabling. furthermore, proof would be difficult, the only way would be to do it on a site that lets datamining, and have the person let the dataminer know when they are playing.
i think anyone laying 10:1 or 15:1 is making a terrible bet, but 1.5:1 is really solid... depending on who is attempting this (if it is grindplz) the true odds are likely closer to 4:1 or 5:1 against, but then again i have no idea his true stats, only playing with him a little. |
|
|